tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3642195726980903864..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Fit to sue; Forthcoming AIPPI talkVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-80974751818435372322007-10-11T21:48:00.000+01:002007-10-11T21:48:00.000+01:00Having a formal ban on employees taking their radi...Having a formal ban on employees taking their radios to work sounds an unusual way of authorising their employees to use them!<BR/><BR/>Furthermore, I would be interested to see whether the PRS go for damages or account of profits. Are they going to argue that they come to actual monetary harm when a fitter turns a radio on? Or are they going to argue that people are prepared to pay more for their cars to be fixed if they can listen to someone else's radio while they are waiting? Both options sound a bit fishy.<BR/><BR/>They'll probably argue something along the lines of "You would have paid us lots of money for a licence, were it not for the fact that you didn't" but is this a valid form of "damage"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com