tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3708141709803633214..comments2024-03-29T06:00:27.896+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Book Review: Intellectual Property Law in China, 2nd Edition Verónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-77396498206555633062021-09-17T02:58:27.177+01:002021-09-17T02:58:27.177+01:00Tian Lu wrote: "Those who are innovating and ...Tian Lu wrote: "Those who are innovating and exploring modalities in the justice system do not shake China’s tradition of statutory law. The discourse in this book would have been more rigorous if the additional explanations above had been provided." But on the same page 9 the authors write "Chinese law is different from the Common Law tradition in that the decision of a higher court or even of the SPC does not bind the lower court (unlike the above-mentioned Interpretations), so that they may decide differently in a similar case." And then the reference is made to my editorial IP in China: Moving closer to the common law system for the sake of uniformity: https://academic-oup-com.eres.qnl.qa/jiplp/article/12/8/621/3978698?searchresult=1Danny Friedmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11107017800955609425noreply@blogger.com