tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3709881086060710195..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: A Monsanto case that could alter the dynamics of technology transfer to IndiaVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-56180476003492442722016-08-13T21:20:28.541+01:002016-08-13T21:20:28.541+01:00I really liked the article. Very informative. Howe...I really liked the article. Very informative. However, have two points to put forth.<br />1.Even if there are pesticides available and "[P]rior to 2001, Indian farmers were growing cotton without the Bt technology", one cnnot say that MMBL's technology is substitutable. Pesticides and genetically modified variety are completely different things. ALso, the modes of achieving the "consequential aspect" by the both are absolutely different. <br />2. The boiler plate clause do have a meaning. Their insertion into an agreement is not merely mechanical. If they have some implications, they should be brought to the scrutiny of the court. <br /><br />Paramjeet Singh, <br />Lawyer, Supreme Court of India.<br />LL.M. (MIPLC, Germany)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-60983546917560226722016-03-04T11:34:48.977+00:002016-03-04T11:34:48.977+00:00* A clarification for the readers:
In the paragrap...* A clarification for the readers:<br />In the paragraph describing the lawsuits before the Delhi High Court, I've stated that there are no appeals against interim injunctions under the new Commercial Courts Act - that was a misreading of the law - Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act only bars applications or petitions for civil revision. It does not bar appeals against interim injunctions.<br /><br />My apologies for the initial error. <br /><br />Regards,<br />Prashant Prashant Reddyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00745673293260292146noreply@blogger.com