tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post3716932741787995870..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: [Guest post] What if AI wrote this post? – An inquiry into the impact of AI on the creative industriesVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-26487674951385498932023-05-22T23:40:24.638+01:002023-05-22T23:40:24.638+01:00Thank you for a useful and thoughtful post. I don&...Thank you for a useful and thoughtful post. I don't know how easy or valid it is to distinguish "just generating output" from "performing a creative action". If a human did either they might be perceived as being "creative" but there's a significant bias (in business, society, culture, law etc) against acknowledging AI creativity, probably because it's not something we've ever previously had to consider. It's true to say that AI can't (currently) directly replicate human creativity, but I'm not sure it's valid to say that the latter is a "much more complex process", nor that creativity should be seen as "inherently human" (unless you subscribe to eg the Lovelace Objection). To take a steer from Turing, asking whether AI can be creative is the wrong question - it's much more productive to ask whether AI can indistinguishably imitate humans (who are, undoubtedly, capable of creativity).BrandHeelernoreply@blogger.com