tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post5215999153080828205..comments2024-03-28T09:05:22.006+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Breaking news: Vodkat falls foul of extended passing-offVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-81408605736596620832010-01-25T17:16:13.526+00:002010-01-25T17:16:13.526+00:00Or kat-chacha?Or kat-chacha?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-372217978337954032010-01-20T15:01:09.292+00:002010-01-20T15:01:09.292+00:00Perhaps IBC could try Adwokat?
EdTPerhaps IBC could try Adwokat?<br /><br />EdTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-61477183847744735022010-01-19T21:54:04.154+00:002010-01-19T21:54:04.154+00:00Does Tufty not have proprietary rights to the suff...Does Tufty not have proprietary rights to the suffix "Kat"? If so, why does she not claim damages from Vodkat? There is no doubt that many consumers purchased their Vodkat on the basis of their assumption that it was associated with the Ipkat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com