tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post5459908828573600854..comments2024-03-28T13:45:42.289+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Mann interprets vegislation in blood-test patent appealVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-67637701532090669022010-11-25T11:37:09.237+00:002010-11-25T11:37:09.237+00:00appeal just decided on this
http://www.bailii.org...appeal just decided on this<br /><br />http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2010/1283.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-8185385089827130232009-12-04T16:49:34.627+00:002009-12-04T16:49:34.627+00:00caveat vendor! ... so, we might be soon seeing pre...caveat vendor! ... so, we might be soon seeing precautionary clauses in contracts relating to the disposal of IP which would try to allow the original "employer" to recover (from the purchaser of the IP) any later award to his inventor/employee, based on the quantum of profit from the purchaser's exploitation of the IP!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com