tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post5576131062815479602..comments2024-03-29T13:59:42.629+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Supreme folly? No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-8539927950036615082015-02-24T12:32:23.050+00:002015-02-24T12:32:23.050+00:00In the olden days in the UK, the office would have...In the olden days in the UK, the office would have required a disclaimer to the word "supreme". A much better system, in my opinion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-53062125638662457462015-02-24T12:26:30.973+00:002015-02-24T12:26:30.973+00:00I think the really interesting element was the exp...I think the really interesting element was the exposition on the evidential burden in such cases and the evolution of the law.<br /><br />I think he is clearly correct on the burden in "origin" cases, but I agree that there is a difficult gloss in the keyword cases.Aaronnoreply@blogger.com