tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post6553350085727688448..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Case T‑579/10, a list of dos and don'ts for trade mark litigation in the EUVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-16335626651183663822013-05-08T15:20:53.106+01:002013-05-08T15:20:53.106+01:00Long live the incoherence. National law is a quest...Long live the incoherence. National law is a question of fact and evidence? In 100 cases the Office has decides on passing off and tomorrow it must ignore its previous knowledge - just because the opponent managed to proof a minority opinion? The opponent must explain to the specialised agency IP law? Not convincing at all. It is the wrong approach. It would be better if the OHIM investigates on national law (see OHIM's guidelines). Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-41321072495518296232013-05-08T15:18:25.694+01:002013-05-08T15:18:25.694+01:00Ihih, I must say I want more of these dos and don&...Ihih, I must say I want more of these dos and don'ts. They brighten up my days!<br /><br />Seriously, I can't understand why people keep submitting new evidence at the General Court, when they know it's not going to even look at it?!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com