tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post6748226039146051804..comments2024-03-29T09:21:58.696+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Intellectual property standards: how do YOU behave?Verónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-36255692207623108502010-07-27T02:01:50.687+01:002010-07-27T02:01:50.687+01:00In my opinion, Standards and intellectual property...In my opinion, Standards and intellectual property rights are separate entities and one should not override the other. <br /><br />If one invents something new, it may meet a standard but standards should in no way negate the rights of the property.Salt lake city paralegalhttp://eastridgeparalegal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-79850382124362974192010-07-23T10:21:43.785+01:002010-07-23T10:21:43.785+01:00Yet another bl**dy survey, with zillions of little...Yet another bl**dy survey, with zillions of little boxes to check and brilliant questions such as "1. What approximate share of the standards, relevant for your enterprise, is covered by essential IPRs? 0% 1%-25% 26%-50% 51%-75% 76%-100%" Do they honestly expect that people will make an effort to figure out what the surveyor actually means when in reality the answers collected from a (probably) statistically insignificant number of questionnaires filled by an unverified sample will eventually be massaged in some meaningless number?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-74209221823806821632010-07-23T10:02:59.667+01:002010-07-23T10:02:59.667+01:00Isn't the Fraunhofer Society, which gets a con...Isn't the Fraunhofer Society, which gets a considerable part of its revenue from standard-essential patents, notably MPEG-related patents, a somewhat biased observer in this subject? (They should know it well, though)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com