tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post6953391676825639816..comments2024-03-28T11:16:43.146+00:00Comments on The IPKat: BREAKING NEWS: missing UK copyright exceptions are backVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-29555222037375373542014-09-18T12:50:24.099+01:002014-09-18T12:50:24.099+01:00LOL at "scrutiny" of the private copying...LOL at "scrutiny" of the private copying exception. as drafted s28 (the private copying exception) has more holes in it than a June bride. Bunch of Incompetents.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-78764729186715098322014-06-10T02:34:01.017+01:002014-06-10T02:34:01.017+01:00Missing Copyright exceptions. More cock up than co...Missing Copyright exceptions. More cock up than conspiracy? Just checked the private copying SI redraft: <br /><br />Latest SI:"<b> Personal copies for private use</b><br />3.—(1) After section 28A(a) insert——"<br /><br />Previous SI:"<b>Personal copies for private use</b><br /><br />3. (1) After section 28A(4) insert—— "<br /><br />where (4) is a hyperlink to footnote 4 of the SI. There is, of course, no section 28A(4) in CDPA 1988.<br /><br />Same applies to schedule 2 citation.<br /><br />Latest SI: "(3) In Schedule 2, after paragraph 1A(a) insert—"<br /><br />previous SI: "(3) In Schedule 2, after paragraph 1A(6) insert— "<br /><br />where (6) is a hyperlink to footnote 6 of the SI<br /><br />The same misdrafting of footnote hyperlink for CPDA 1988 section seems to have occured in the previous quotation and parody SI <br /><br />Latest SI: "<b>Quotation: amendments to section 30</b><br />3.—(1) Section 30(a) is amended as follows."<br /><br />Previous SI : "<b>Quotation: amendments to section 30</b><br />3. (1) Section 30(4) is amended as follows."<br />where (4) is a hyperlink to footnote 4 of the SI<br /><br />Latest SI: "<b>Quotation: amendments to Schedule 2</b><br />4.—(1) Paragraph 2(b) of Schedule 2 is amended as follows."<br /><br />Previous SI: "<b>Quotation: amendments to Schedule 2</b><br />4. (1) Paragraph 2(5) of Schedule 2 is amended as follows." <br /><br />Where (5) is a hyperlink to footnote 5 of the SI<br /><br />The parody drafting appears unchanged.Pete Carrollhttp://www.ipgnosis.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-45601380351141333452014-06-09T17:10:08.434+01:002014-06-09T17:10:08.434+01:00@Anonymous: I'm certainly happy for you to quo...@Anonymous: I'm certainly happy for you to quote me on it... Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00395732944147915836noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-78996938107997165092014-06-09T14:57:34.855+01:002014-06-09T14:57:34.855+01:00"has really taken on board"....
Is that..."has really taken on board"....<br /><br />Is that a form of parody?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-9962253715707470222014-06-09T14:18:45.081+01:002014-06-09T14:18:45.081+01:00I've only looked at r.3 of the private copying...I've only looked at r.3 of the private copying SI so far, and that appears to be word-for-word identical. <br /><br />The quotation/parody SI appears to be completely unchanged. <br /><br />So, looks like the government has really taken on board the questions raised by the Scrutiny Committee... Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00395732944147915836noreply@blogger.com