tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post708297222304542812..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Five considerations for the transposition and application of Article 17 of the DSM DirectiveVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-22664866174803183952021-02-17T22:16:40.007+00:002021-02-17T22:16:40.007+00:00"(...) as a final note, the challenge launche..."(...) as a final note, the challenge launched by Poland to Article 17 before the CJEU reflects some substantial and important concerns. These, however, relate to the application of the provision, not its very existence."<br /><br />Well, the Application by Poland contains a plea that: "In the alternative, should the Court find that the contested provisions cannot be deleted from Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 without substantively changing the rules contained in the remaining provisions of that article, the Republic of Poland claims that >>>the Court should annul Article 17 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 in its entirety.<<<" <br /><br />http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=216823&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=312226Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com