tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post7273758201591981485..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: Servier perindopril "try-on" slammedVerónica Rodríguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-30925849750397477652008-05-12T05:08:00.000+01:002008-05-12T05:08:00.000+01:00Perindopril is not going any where.Servier has alr...Perindopril is not going any where.<BR/>Servier has already moved on from different crystalline forms of the erbumine salts [debated in your blog post] to a completely new salt [Perindopril Arginine].<BR/>They are also fighting an opposition at EPO against this new salt.<BR/><BR/>So, looks like Perindopril litigation will continue for some time to come.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-14177203324597440062008-05-09T23:02:00.000+01:002008-05-09T23:02:00.000+01:00Hard to reconcile this robust and brutally swift J...Hard to reconcile this robust and brutally swift Jacobian dispensing of justice in Europe with the piece in this month's "Managing Intellectual Property" magazine from two members of the German litigation firm Krieger, which states (page 75) "To put it in a nutshell: German patent courts are the first choice worldwide for patent litigation" When the waiting period for a revocation decision from the BGH (appeal instance) is FIVE WHOLE YEARS, that assertion in MIP is simply laecherlich. Why do they need to make such laughable assertions? But where are the articles in MIP from proponents of patent litigation in England? Fact is: litigation in Duesseldorf is ADR beefed up with injunctions, not adversarial litigation with exposure of the real facts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-1242440865763460152008-05-09T14:58:00.000+01:002008-05-09T14:58:00.000+01:00‼ I love this blog, again.<A HREF="http://angel.ya76oo.com" REL="nofollow">‼</A> I love this blog, again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com