tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post9106168965855225753..comments2024-03-28T16:45:51.051+00:00Comments on The IPKat: The champagne of trade mark disputesVerónica RodrÃguez Arguijohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05763207846940036921noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-58521268889587268942016-12-29T12:10:32.122+00:002016-12-29T12:10:32.122+00:00Except the facts were pre-UMTR?Except the facts were pre-UMTR?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-19249804847940180242016-12-29T11:28:03.894+00:002016-12-29T11:28:03.894+00:00Soory anon, but you are wrong. The acts were commi...Soory anon, but you are wrong. The acts were committed prior to the amendment to the regulation.Kantnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574479.post-84868925377273427262016-12-29T09:20:39.390+00:002016-12-29T09:20:39.390+00:00Deduct a point from the legal teams and the judge ...Deduct a point from the legal teams and the judge for referring to Article 9 1 (c) rather Article 9 2 (c). <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com