Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Alessandro Cerri, Oliver Fairhurst and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Simone Lorenzi and Asude Sena Moya.
Search results for convatec
The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Wednesday, January 01, 2014 Rating: 5
Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not over Smith & Nephew seek to go to the Supreme Court and EPO proceedings continue - the war is not over Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, July 30, 2015 Rating: 5
Not so secret agent: when Bond isn't 007 but 0.77 Not so secret agent: when Bond isn't 007 but 0.77 Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, June 25, 2015 Rating: 5
Round, round: how to round? How do we round? Round, round: how to round? How do we round? Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Sunday, June 28, 2015 Rating: 5
Taking the Exudate - ConvaTec v Smith & Nephew [2011] EWHC 2039 (Pat) Taking the Exudate - <i>ConvaTec v Smith & Nephew</i> [2011] EWHC 2039 (Pat) Reviewed by Matt on Wednesday, July 27, 2011 Rating: 5
Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrong Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrong Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Wednesday, July 08, 2015 Rating: 5
Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week ... Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week ... Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, July 13, 2015 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.