Missed the Week's IP Insights? Here's a Quick Recap!
Patents
Rose Hughes discussed the importance of meticulous documentation in securing and defending intellectual property rights, highlighting how detailed records can be crucial in legal disputes.
Rose Hughes examined the Unified Patent Court's (UPC) evolving approach to added matter and priority issues in patent litigation.
Jocelyn Bosse informed on the progression of EU legislation regarding gene patents, detailing the potential impact on biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries.
Trade Marks
Jocelyn Bosse analyzed a recent trade mark decision related to the "Lord of the Rings" franchise, examining the scope of protection for well-known fictional worlds.
Oliver Fairhurst reported on a UK court's decision in a trade mark case, focusing on the implications for brand owners and the interpretation of trade mark law.
Söğüt Atilla explained how the "Game of Thrones" brand's prior use led to the disqualification of a conflicting trade mark application.
Oliver Fairhurst reviewed a trade mark case involving the Morley's chicken shop chain, with a focus on how the courts evaluate the perception of the 'average consumer' in trade mark disputes.
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Rating:
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html