Posts

Featured post

EU General Court confirms that plant variety rights applicants must provide technical data to support requests to examine a new distinguishing characteristic

How can an EU plant variety rights (PVR) applicant have an additional characteristic considered during the technical examination of the variety, if the characteristic doesn't already appear in the test guidelines?   Image by pixel2013 via Pixabay. This question was considered in a recent case about an apple variety named 'Roat' ( Case T‑770/25 , judgment delivered 14 October 2026), where the General Court (Eighth Chamber) determined that it was not enough that the applicant mentioned an additional characteristic in the PVR application. Adema Srl v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) confirmed that more is required from the applicant, including technical data to support a request to consider the new distinguishing characteristic. The Law Community plant variety rights will be granted if the variety meets the key criteria of novelty, a suitable denomination, and distinctness, uniformity and stability (the last three are collectively known as the "DUS" criteria). ...

[Book Review] Geographical Indications in International Trade

Patent Litigation Europe 2027 with IPKat readers’ discount and new speakers announced

Tuesday Wonders

Does a generative AI ‘remix’ infringe Canadian copyright law?

AI in the patent industry: Instant coffee Copilot

[Guest Book Review] IP Before IP

An ‘ordinary’ copyright case on the limits of fair use for non-generative AI-powered search engines

Be careful what you wish for: Hamburg court holds Wish liable for trade mark infringement

[Guest post] French court sides with Vuitton in unauthorized upcycling case

Plant variety rights enforcement continues to ramp up in China

Post-published clinical data does not always save you (T 0251/25, Empagliflozin)