Posts

Featured post

“Truth Social” trade mark invalidated because of bad faith

How much publicity is needed before a trade mark applicant can no longer credibly deny knowledge of another party’s sign? In decision R2260/2025-4 , the Board of Appeal (“BoA”) of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (“EUIPO”) had little difficulty concluding that the applicant for the EU trade mark “Truth Social” was fully aware of the highly publicised plans of Donald J. Trump to launch a social media platform under the same name. Background On 21 October 2021, a private individual applied for registration of EU trade mark “Truth Social” for the following services: Class 35: Advertising, marketing and promotional services. Class 42: IT services; design services; scientific technological services [sic!]; testing, authentication and quality control. Class 45: Online social networking services; computer dating services. After the mark’s registration in 2022, T Media Tech LLC (“TMT”) filed an invalidity application based on bad faith. TMT is an American media and technology ...

Monday Miscellany

Basmati rice certification mark rejected in Australia

Australian Federal Court finds biosimilar etanercept manufacturing processes do not infringe Pfizer's ENBREL process patent

Aviator v Spribe: foreign unfair competition claims cleared for take-off in English courts

The law (or the ‘lore’) of the infamous generative AI ‘Brainrot’ characters

[Guest Post] Dose of reality: The Supreme Court of Canada reconciles the ban on patenting medical treatment with patents on dosing regimens

General Court confirms strict rules on trade mark refiling

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

[Guest post] A €50 million Monet: Public domain, private property, and the hidden IP in an art auction

[Guest Post] Are the German UPC Local Divisions the new Eastern District of Texas?