Posts

Featured post

[Guest Post] Dose of reality: The Supreme Court of Canada reconciles the ban on patenting medical treatment with patents on dosing regimens

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host this guest contribution from Katfriend Jenna Park : Dose of reality: The Supreme Court of Canada reconciles the ban on patenting medical treatment with patents on dosing regimens by Jenna Park A dosing regimen tells a physician how much of a drug should be administered and when. Canadian law has historically treated methods of medical treatment (“MMTs”) as unpatentable, yet patents claiming dosing regimens may be listed on the patent register and enforced against generic manufacturers. In Pharmascience Inc. v. Janssen Inc., 2026 SCC 26 , a majority of seven justices reconciles this tension: the MMT exclusion survived the 1993 repeal of former s.41(1) of the Patent Act but reaches only claims that seek to monopolize professional medical skill and judgment. Two justices would have abolished the exclusion entirely. All nine upheld Janssen’s patent. Background Janssen’s patent claims dosing regimens for a long-acting paliperidone palmitate inje...

General Court confirms strict rules on trade mark refiling

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

[Guest post] A €50 million Monet: Public domain, private property, and the hidden IP in an art auction

[Guest Post] Are the German UPC Local Divisions the new Eastern District of Texas?

AG Szpunar’s Opinion in Like Company is here: a landmark take on several questions facing AI and copyright/related rights, even though the CJEU is advised not to answer the questions on LLM training

Monday Miscellany

The IPKat team: arrivals, farewells, and news

UPCKat: Proportionality defence against life sciences injunctions takes shape at the UPC