Posts

Featured post

Claude 'can’t help falling in love with’… Elvis’s lyrics

As one redditor reflected , the ‘floodgates of Graceland’ opened last week when a group of rightsholders related to musical compositions recorded by Elvis Presley commenced copyright infringement proceedings against Anthropic. Referring to themselves as the ‘Elvis plaintiffs’, they allege that (1) Anthropic used these works to train Claude models without authorisation, and (2) that such models generate infringing output. This Kat is busy picking our her own impersonator for Halloween Photo by Chris Barbalis on Unsplash The complaint Much of this complaint relies upon public filings and decisions concerning Anthropic (e.g. Bartz v. Anthropic – IPKat here and here – and Concord 1 ). It also refers to media reporting and technical documentation about AI training datasets where Anthropic is alleged to have knowledge of the infringing nature of training Claude models and offering them to the public to generate infringing content pursuant to 17 U.S. Code § 106 . Regarding the former, th...

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

An eye for an eye constitutes bad faith

EU General Court confirms that plant variety rights applicants must provide technical data to support requests to examine a new distinguishing characteristic

[Book Review] Geographical Indications in International Trade

Patent Litigation Europe 2027 with IPKat readers’ discount and new speakers announced

Tuesday Wonders

Does a generative AI ‘remix’ infringe Canadian copyright law?

AI in the patent industry: Instant coffee Copilot

[Guest Book Review] IP Before IP

An ‘ordinary’ copyright case on the limits of fair use for non-generative AI-powered search engines

Be careful what you wish for: Hamburg court holds Wish liable for trade mark infringement

[Guest post] French court sides with Vuitton in unauthorized upcycling case