Entrance of Aviation House in London - snow not guaranteed |
It is therefore no surprise that the location of the Unified Patent Court preoccupies many. First, the debate was whether the UK would get the Central Division (see previous AmeriKat post here). Now, the Intellectual Property Office's UPC Taskforce is turning to where the UK's seat of the Central Division and local division hosted in London will be. The current property options are as follows (see fuller summary document found at this link):
Building 1000. This location is opposite City Airport. This means that it would be accessible for international litigants (as long as they are fortunate to come from a country/city that flies into City). It is apparently accessible from Central London in less than 30 minutes (depending on traffic and contingent on you and your clients coming from Central London and not from Heathrow). There is a lot of space available -- some 6 floors with 2,500 sqm per floor. And you can watch airplanes take off and land, which is useful for demonstrations of any aviation patents that may be litigated.
Building 1000
A view from Building 1000. Hours of cross-examination in a sunbeam-filled room with water glistening gently below is surely a recipe for naps.... |
Aviation House. Located in central London (although the name is really more apropos for Building 1000's location), this is apparently a less flexible space and is considered to be the less user-friendly option as no large courtroom is possible and there is limited meeting room availability. However, the interior is modern and is right next to Holborn Tube Station. This means that it is in the legal district so for those English judges who are sitting in the UPC, they can sit in the Patents Court in the morning and saunter over to Aviation House for their afternoon UPC interim hearing. Being on the Piccadilly line means that those litigants arriving from Heathrow have a simple journey in. Sainsburys is on the ground floor so you can also get your weekly shopping out of the way.
Floor plan depicting numerous pillars which makes Aviation House a less flexible space |
Aviation House
Tough call. The AmeriKat understands from an anonymous source that the EPLAW Board was recently contacted by the UPC Taskforce of the UK IPO with the aim to to test with stakeholders their thoughts on these possible locations. To assist the UK IPO and governments of other Signatory States who are also looking for locations for their UPC divisions, the EPLAW board decided to launch a consultation among EPLAW members via a survey (see this link to the document) the results of which would then be shared with the UK Government. The UKIPO has also requested that opinions be emailed to jonathan.england@ipo.gov.uk with short comments on reasons for preferring one property over the other.
London's UPC division coming to a location near you? |
If no one can reach an agreement on the location, the AmeriKat suggests that the UK Government just buys a few luxury touring bus and with the judges literally at the wheel, the UPC can come to you. Roadtrip!
Seems pretty clear from the questions what answer they want.
ReplyDeleteCrossrail should make it much easier to get to the Building 1000 option in the Docklands. Around 15 minutes from Farringdon and just over 50 minutes from Heathrow according to the journey time calculator on the Crossrail website.
ReplyDeleteAgree the questions are extremely biased.
ReplyDeleteIsn't Holborn the better choice? It's more or less equidistant from all the London Airports and in easy reach of both national and international rail terminals.
The NEF made a case for closing London City airport less than a year ago: http://www.neweconomics.org/press/entry/close-london-city-airport
ReplyDeleteI've never actually managed to fly to/from City. I've tried a couple of times, but the weather has intervened (short runway next to the docks means fog is a real problem).
Plus for those of us who don't operate in London, and need to travel in from the North (e.g. via Kings X, St Pancras, Euston), then London City is quite difficult to get to.
Didn't we try locating an IP Court outside the Holborn/Chancery Lane area once? Somewhere near Regents Park iirc...?
ReplyDeleteHow well did that go? Is the Court still there? ;-)
Oh @patently Don't you remember Wood Green - too young.
ReplyDeleteSurely we need to know the length of the lease and be certain its IT capabilities can cope. Otherwise starting small and with a front office you can talk too would be brilliant and for that Sainsbury's if a little less illustrious would do. Remember that with proper use of gadgets we dont need trolley loads of bundles- 3 tablets should cover even the most complex of cases
I remember Wood Green: it was lovely, a real litigation adventure playground. I even litigated there against my one-time employers and publishers of Trademark World. I won :-)
ReplyDeleteSorry to disagree with all of those "I work in Holborn therefore it is essential to be withing walking district of my favourite Starbucks" legal types, but the travelling arrangements for you and your ilk should be a complete irrelevance. City airport is a great location for everyone. It is a fantastic airport for European destinations, apart from Munich, but then that is because Munich is a problematic destination for UK travellers and not a fault of City. For non-City airport destinations, fly to Stansted and get a taxi. You can also stay in many high quality non-central London hotels (or Premier Inn) all within a 30 min drive.
ReplyDeleteA better option would be to base the court near to Stansted airport (Ryan air, at least, consider this to be London).
Building 1000 is rather reliant on Crossrail (not everyone is going to come into City Airport especially litigants from outside Europe) - which according to its timetable won't be running until late 2018/early 2019, after the Court has started (we hope). The Holborn option however is only short term - it isn't very big at all. Perhaps though that's no bad thing in the early days - it must be better for the judges to be close to the Court if they may be doing both local and UPC work (as I understand it this is for both the UK local and London central divisions).
ReplyDeleteLocation is clearly more important, how else can we all bill the extra hour we leave to get there early, and the hour it takes to get back alongside all the Canary Wharf rush hour traffic? Two hours extra billing a day across Partner, Associate(s) and Counsel(s) will add up. Point that out to clients and they may prefer a central location.
ReplyDeleteIs Bldg 1000 accessible via the DLR?
ReplyDeleteI travelled via City Airport to European destination weekly for 18 months without a single fog problem.
ReplyDeleteThose clients who don't want to pay for central London lawyers to travel should consider using firm based at Canary Wharf.
ReplyDeleteHere's a thought: Why doesn't the UK stop being so London-centric?
to Anon @06.01.
ReplyDeleteYes Building 1000 right next to Royal Albert DLR station which is on the Becton spur of the DLR. Thus it is easily accessible from Stratford Eurostar, the City (Bank DLR) and of course Canary Wharf.
Rouse are near Canary wharf?
ReplyDeleteBarbara, the pharma cases normally cover just the 2 tablets: originator and generic.
ReplyDeleteCharlie Hebdo
The Court should make use of Ally Pally.
ReplyDeleteThere are many critics on this blog of those of us who comment anonymously.
I propose that the 'anonymous said' option is changed to "Charlie Hebdo" from this day forwards.
Charlie Hebdo