Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Oliver Fairhurst and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Anastasiia Kyrylenko (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Simone Lorenzi and Asude Sena Moya.
No delay following an intervention to an accelerated EPO appeal during parallel UPC proceedings (T 1841/23) No delay following an intervention to an accelerated EPO appeal during parallel UPC proceedings (T 1841/23) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, January 31, 2025 Rating: 5
[Guest Post] Unwrapping the Geographical Indication Status Dilemma of the ‘Dubai Chocolate’. [Guest Post] Unwrapping the Geographical Indication Status Dilemma of the ‘Dubai Chocolate’. Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Wednesday, January 29, 2025 Rating: 5
Deadline extension: IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2024 Deadline extension: IPKat Book of the Year Awards 2024 Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko on Wednesday, January 29, 2025 Rating: 5
Is ‘coffee’ misleading for ‘tea’? EUIPO thinks so! Is ‘coffee’ misleading for ‘tea’? EUIPO thinks so! Reviewed by Söğüt Atilla on Wednesday, January 29, 2025 Rating: 5
UPC finds that it has jurisdiction to consider infringement in the UK (UPC_CFI_355/2023) UPC finds that it has jurisdiction to consider infringement in the UK (UPC_CFI_355/2023) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Tuesday, January 28, 2025 Rating: 5
UK format rights claim ends in Shambles UK format rights claim ends in Shambles Reviewed by Alessandro Cerri on Tuesday, January 28, 2025 Rating: 5
The UPC's first decision on infringement by equivalence (Plant-e v Bioo, UPC_CFI_239/2023) The UPC's first decision on infringement by equivalence (Plant-e v Bioo, UPC_CFI_239/2023) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Tuesday, January 28, 2025 Rating: 5
CJEU to decide whether publishers may receive CMO-run funds from private copying CJEU to decide whether publishers may receive CMO-run funds from private copying Reviewed by Anastasiia Kyrylenko on Monday, January 27, 2025 Rating: 5
New CJEU reference: What is the relevant point in time for the assessment of design infringement? New CJEU reference: What is the relevant point in time for the assessment of design infringement? Reviewed by Marcel Pemsel on Monday, January 27, 2025 Rating: 5
[Guest Post] Thatchers v Aldi – is the UK moving towards a tort of unfair competition? [Guest Post] Thatchers v Aldi – is the UK moving towards a tort of unfair competition? Reviewed by Jocelyn Bosse on Monday, January 27, 2025 Rating: 5
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Asude Sena Moya on Monday, January 27, 2025 Rating: 5
GuestPost: Holistic approaches in patent obviousness: US and EU perspectives GuestPost: Holistic approaches in patent obviousness: US and EU perspectives Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Saturday, January 25, 2025 Rating: 5
New Vatican AI Guidelines for the development and use of AI models: from AI training to Vatican’s authorship and ownership of AI-generated outputs (at least within the Vatican City State) New Vatican AI Guidelines for the development and use of AI models: from AI training to Vatican’s authorship and ownership of AI-generated outputs (at least within the Vatican City State) Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Saturday, January 25, 2025 Rating: 5
Page 1 of 14761231476Next
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.