Results for Costs
CRYSTAL VAPE: Proving unregistered earlier rights CRYSTAL VAPE: Proving unregistered earlier rights Reviewed by Oliver Fairhurst on Monday, July 07, 2025 Rating: 5
[UPCKat] Preliminary injunctions in the UPC: CUP&CINO v Alpina Coffee Systems [UPCKat] Preliminary injunctions in the UPC:  CUP&CINO v Alpina Coffee Systems Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Monday, April 22, 2024 Rating: 5
Daniel Alexander KC says "no" on indemnity costs, blanket confidentiality orders and permission to appeal in Oxford University Innovation dispute Daniel Alexander KC says "no" on indemnity costs, blanket confidentiality orders and permission to appeal in Oxford University Innovation dispute Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Rating: 5
[Guest Post] Fighting for your IP rights in Denmark – it’s expensive, but now maybe less so? [Guest Post] Fighting for your IP rights in Denmark – it’s expensive, but now maybe less so? Reviewed by Alex Woolgar on Sunday, October 13, 2019 Rating: 5
Henry Carr J refuses Abbott's mitral valve preliminary injunction Henry Carr J refuses Abbott's mitral valve preliminary injunction Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Wednesday, May 29, 2019 Rating: 5
Lycra owner gets in a tight spot on costs: Unjust Part 36 offers, ex employees, breach of confidence & more Lycra owner gets in a tight spot on costs: Unjust Part 36 offers, ex employees, breach of confidence & more Reviewed by Rosie Burbidge on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 Rating: 5
Mr Justice Birss introduces the brand new FRAND Injunction in Unwired Planet v Huawei Mr Justice Birss introduces the brand new FRAND Injunction in Unwired Planet v Huawei Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, June 08, 2017 Rating: 5
AIPPI Report: Recapping 2016's most important soft IP cases AIPPI Report: Recapping 2016's most important soft IP cases Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 Rating: 5
Part 36 offers in the IP Enterprise Court Part 36 offers in the IP Enterprise Court Reviewed by Rosie Burbidge on Monday, December 12, 2016 Rating: 5
BREAKING: CJEU says that free Wi-Fi provider is not liable for third-party copyright infringements but may be required to password-protect its network to terminate infringements BREAKING: CJEU says that free Wi-Fi provider is not liable for third-party copyright infringements but may be required to password-protect its network to terminate infringements Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, September 15, 2016 Rating: 5
Powered by Blogger.