Results for Sky v Skykick
SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement SkyKicked: High Court confirms trade mark infringement Reviewed by Alex Woolgar on Thursday, April 30, 2020 Rating: 5
Furry thoughts on Sky v. Skykick – Part 2: trade marks registered with no intention to use Furry thoughts on Sky v. Skykick – Part 2: trade marks registered with no intention to use Reviewed by Léon Dijkman on Monday, February 03, 2020 Rating: 5
[BREAKING] A-G Tanchev finds lack of intention to use a trade mark can be indicative of bad faith & insufficiently clear and precise registrations may be contrary to public policy [BREAKING] A-G Tanchev finds lack of intention to use a trade mark can be indicative of bad faith & insufficiently clear and precise registrations may be contrary to public policy Reviewed by Léon Dijkman on Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Rating: 5
Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? Counsel's perspective Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? Counsel's perspective Reviewed by Rosie Burbidge on Friday, May 17, 2019 Rating: 5
What is bad faith? AG Kokott provides some indications What is bad faith? AG Kokott provides some indications Reviewed by Antonella Gentile on Thursday, April 11, 2019 Rating: 5
Event report: Retromark – the conference Event report: Retromark – the conference Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, April 10, 2019 Rating: 5
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, June 04, 2018 Rating: 5
When is a decision on its merits not over? When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo When is a decision on its merits not over?   When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo Reviewed by Neil Wilkof on Friday, May 25, 2018 Rating: 5
Powered by Blogger.