Results for
conceptual similarity
General Court: Conceptual identity in different languages insufficient for likelihood of confusion
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
Rating:
5
Is Elton confusingly similar with Elon?
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, September 16, 2024
Rating:
5
“El TORO LOCO”: when a Monster truck show amounts to both trade mark and copyright infringement
Reviewed by
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Thursday, February 29, 2024
Rating:
5
TOUR DE FRANCE vs. TOUR DE FRANCE A LA RAME : Reputation of TOUR DE FRANCE limited to cycling competitions
Reviewed by
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Wednesday, November 29, 2023
Rating:
5
“miababy” and “ia BABY interapothek”: Average phonetic similarity doesn’t offset low visual and conceptual similarity
Reviewed by
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
on
Tuesday, November 14, 2023
Rating:
5
The conceptual comparison – To be or not to be neglected?
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Monday, August 28, 2023
Rating:
5
Do names convey a clear and specific concept?
Reviewed by
Marcel Pemsel
on
Tuesday, July 11, 2023
Rating:
5
CJEU confirms no likelihood of confusion between MASSI and MESSI
Reviewed by
Léon Dijkman
on
Thursday, September 17, 2020
Rating:
5
CJEU rules on counteraction by conceptual differences in trade mark law, but leaves much to be resolved
Reviewed by
Léon Dijkman
on
Tuesday, March 17, 2020
Rating:
5
Are two different whales conceptually identical? Fourth Board of Appeal finds likelihood of confusion despite some visual dissimilarities between marks
Reviewed by
Nedim Malovic
on
Tuesday, December 03, 2019
Rating:
5
GC excludes likelihood of confusion between marks representing stylized human figure and relating to same goods due to low distinctiveness of shared concept
Reviewed by
Nedim Malovic
on
Sunday, November 24, 2019
Rating:
5
What's in a name? General Court rules conceptual comparison of names normally not possible
Reviewed by
Léon Dijkman
on
Tuesday, September 10, 2019
Rating:
5