Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Results for expert evidence
Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers Reviewed by Peter Ling on Tuesday, August 25, 2020 Rating: 5
Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Monday, June 03, 2019 Rating: 5
How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, March 29, 2018 Rating: 5
Does the doctrine of equivalents apply to novelty? Does the doctrine of equivalents apply to novelty? Reviewed by Eibhlin Vardy on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 Rating: 5
AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch - role of experts in litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch - role of experts in litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Friday, September 23, 2016 Rating: 5
To tub, or not to tub? Last chance to comment on Civil Justice Council's expert hot-tubbing survey To tub, or not to tub? Last chance to comment on Civil Justice Council's expert hot-tubbing survey Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, May 26, 2016 Rating: 5
Colourless Copaxone in the clear: Teva's synthesis patents held to be (mostly) valid Colourless Copaxone in the clear: Teva's synthesis patents held to be (mostly) valid Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, May 21, 2015 Rating: 5
Inventiveness and incontinence: a barrage of cross-purpose expert evidence Inventiveness and incontinence: a barrage of cross-purpose expert evidence Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, May 01, 2014 Rating: 5
Sandwich carton patent: who takes the (w)rap? Sandwich carton patent: who takes the (w)rap? Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, June 22, 2010 Rating: 5
eSure v Direct Line - the end of the line for brand experts? eSure v Direct Line - the end of the line for brand experts? Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.