For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Friday, 16 August 2013

Branding of law firms: what's the message? Does it matter?

What did you think of the name "King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin"? After it was announced that London-based law firm SJ Berwin was combining this autumn with King & Wood Mallesons, a leading law firm network in the Asia Pacific region, it appeared that the name "King & Wood Mallesons SJ Berwin" had been chosen either as a stop-gap or as the new entity's ultimate name, depending on which version of the firm's press release you received.  The IPKat ran a sidebar poll to ask readers what they thought of this marvel of nomenclature.  This is how a gratifying 357 of you voted:

  • It's a great name that respects the proud heritage of two distinguished law firms 4 (1%) 
  • It's no better or worse than any other name 5 (1%) 
  • It's a bit of a mouthful, isn't it? 62 (17%) 
  • It must be a temporary fix, leading to a rebrand within the year 67 (18%) 
  • Sounds like too many lawyers refusing to back down 135 (37%) 
  • There can't be a clumsier law firm name on the planet 84 (23%) 
The message is clear: whatever a law firm's motives for short-, medium- or long-term branding of its services, the result may be received with something less than unbounded admiration by the rest of the world. Says this Kat, if I were a client I'd be more concerned with the level of professional service and its cost-effectiveness than with what the firm chose to call itself.  Clients pay a high level of attention to the important things, not the trivialities: it's not like choosing soap in the supermarket. Mind you, if it were called something live Everwin & Neverlose, I might be influenced ... Sure, says Merpel, but if you were an established practitioner looking to move to a firm that would be the next step up in your career, if you were one of the 37% of respondents who saw the name as a consequence of too many lawyers refusing to back down, would you not be a little concerned about heading there?

Great name for a law firm?
Readers may wish to offer some thoughts of their own on the importance of law firm branding, since it can be so emotive.  Take Adam & Eve for example: what does it tell you about a law firm?  Possibly that there's a 50-50 split between male and female partners; that the partnership is a fruitful one; that you can look forward to dress-down Friday -- or what?  Do tell!

6 comments:

Peter Smith said...

I seem to recall that Adam & Eve were punished by their Regulator following a breach of the code of conduct.

Andre said...

Worst name for a law firm: Dewey, Cheetum and Howe...

Tom Farrand said...

Adam & Eve
Snakes in the grass acting for apple?
Specialists in cases of original sin?

Anonymous said...

Beware of the snake in the grass?

Anonymous said...

I can't Adam & Eve it's a law firm...

Anonymous said...

I still think that 'Mallesons SJ' may send an unintended message.

George

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':