US and China's Unprecedented Anti-Counterfeiting Partnership

Working together to
combat counterfeiting
For one month, the US Customs and Border Protection agency ("CBP") and its Chinese counterpart, the General Administration of China Customs ("GACC"), teamed up for an extensive operation to combat the distribution of counterfeit goods.  According to Reuters, the agencies successfully seized "more than 243,000 fake electronics products, including popular consumer items made by Apple, Samsung, Beats by Dr. Dre, and Blackberry."  [Merpel purrs in surprise and amusement at seeing Apple and Samsung both referenced in a sentence devoid of the words "patents", "lawsuit", "dispute" or other combative terms.] 

The offending goods were seized by Chinese or US authorities at, respectively, the Chinese point of export or the US point of import.  [Merpel wonders if it bears pointing out that there were no reports of seizures at the US point of export or Chinese point of import....]  The acting CBP commissioner, Thomas Winkowski, explains in a CBP press release that,
"[t]he theft of intellectual property is a global problem and cross-border efforts are needed to fight it. CBP looks forward to a continued partnership with the People’s Republic of China General Administration of Customs in confronting this critical trade issue.  Robust enforcement of intellectual property rights allows innovators and creators – whether in a small start-up or an international corporation – to profit from their efforts, and gives consumers confidence in the products they buy." 
The impressive results of this cross-border operation highlights positive developments in intellectual property rights enforcement in China.  Says Zou Zhiwu, Vice Minister of GACC:
“IPR infringement is a global issue involving not only the process of production and export, but also that of import and circulation. It not only harms the order of global trade, but also threatens the health and safety of consumers. Enforcement agencies around the world should work more closely to crack down these illegal activities. China Customs has been making unremitting efforts to promote international cooperation in this field. The results of this joint operation are very inspiring and have consolidated our confidence and resolve to jointly fight against IPR violations....”
Long-term US cooperation with China in this respect is an appropriate priority for CBP considering that seventy-two percent of all counterfeit goods seized in the US are imported from China.  [If there's ever a reason for Apple and Samsung to put aside their differences and collaborate, it would be to cooperate on combating criminal counterfeiting activities that harm both companies.]

Though there have been prior joint operations between CBP and its counterparts in other countries, the partnership with GACC is the largest ever undertaken.  If this is the merely the first of similar large scale cooperative efforts between customs agencies around the globe, this Kat is more hopeful that global counterfeiting operations could be successfully combatted.

US and China's Unprecedented Anti-Counterfeiting Partnership US and China's Unprecedented Anti-Counterfeiting Partnership Reviewed by Miri Frankel on Tuesday, August 06, 2013 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Presumably the concept of mutual need reflected in the term 'Chinamerica' means cooperation is going to happen more and more. Perhaps they'll adopt a unitary patent system across the two nations after they see the roaring success it will be in Europe.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.