Copyright
Guest contributor Desmond Oriakhogba discussed the impact of Nigeria’s new Copyright Act 2022 on libraries, and how they stand to benefit from a range of exceptions in the act such as specific provisions to support research.
Eleonora Rosati reported on the Federal Court of Justice of Germany’s decision that it is “clear” that works of applied art are to be treated like other works following Cofemel, despite there being conflicting interpretations of this across the EU.
Patents
Annsley Merelle Ward reported on the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property’s annual patent round-up, which took place in January this year.
Trade marks
Marcel Pemsel commented on the General Court’s recent decision in T-178/22, where a trademark application for “FUCKING AWESOME” was found to be insufficiently distinctive.
Guest contributors Jakob Plesner Mathiasen and Paul Sina discussed how trade marks and other intellectual property rights apply in the realm of video games.
Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot commented on the EUIPO Board of Appeal’s ruling that the owner of trade mark for rabbit-like character called Miffy could oppose registration of a similar mark for sex toys due to tarnishment of reputation.
Never too late: if you missed the IPKat this week
Reviewed by Benjamin Goh
on
Sunday, April 09, 2023
Rating:
Reviewed by Benjamin Goh
on
Sunday, April 09, 2023
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn ![[Guest post] Can AI be considered a PHOSITA? Policy debates in the US and the EU](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEggxDO6mW5r4n3-06Af5ckmIaMIhzgPJBoDP8AUsSYXY2zajUQt1ObGVn_GhCgidbG_YDVnybQuJ5XoAjjBG9Ws2xJWDQHNPMrLkn526SWIG371X_Kjt1E8tJmn8Ae_20Phyphenhyphen09JeuUOhhTR3aZE9lMRQlqHGQGcAWGxlo91rrKcLk0AfUjWCvw6RQ/s72-c/Two-cats-eating.jpg)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html