According to The Register , former Dixons ISP spin-off Freeserve is once again considering plans to ditch its brand and replace it with the livery of its French parent Wanadoo. Last year Wanadoo CEO Nicolas Dufourcq threatened to scrap the popular if non-too-profitable Freeserve brand. This January the ISP said that the decision not to go ahead with the £30 million makeover had been made after an "extensive evaluation" found that there was "a huge strength of feeling for the Freeserve brand in the UK". But this week’s press release, detailing Wanadoo's half-year results, makes no reference to Freeserve by name, calling it "Wanadoo United Kingdom".
Wanadoo is not well known in the UK. Moreover it happens to be French -- and anti-French sentiment remains high after Gulf War II and French resistance to the importation of British beef. However, earlier this summer Freeserve adopted the strapline "Freeserve - A Wanadoo Company", which will gain more coverage as Freeserve embarks on its autumn schedule of press and TV advertisements. The IPKat is watching with interest: will the name of Freeserve, with the extra protection to which well known brands are entitled, be scrapped, or will it be retained in place of the unusual and therefore potentially more distinctive Wanadoo?
Anglo-Saxon francophobia here and here
Britain’s favourite French products here, here and here
Wanadoo is not well known in the UK. Moreover it happens to be French -- and anti-French sentiment remains high after Gulf War II and French resistance to the importation of British beef. However, earlier this summer Freeserve adopted the strapline "Freeserve - A Wanadoo Company", which will gain more coverage as Freeserve embarks on its autumn schedule of press and TV advertisements. The IPKat is watching with interest: will the name of Freeserve, with the extra protection to which well known brands are entitled, be scrapped, or will it be retained in place of the unusual and therefore potentially more distinctive Wanadoo?
Anglo-Saxon francophobia here and here
Britain’s favourite French products here, here and here
WANADOO OR WANADON’T
![<strong>WANADOO OR WANADON’T</strong>]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, September 03, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Asking ourselves ‘Y’ – Are shape marks shaping complex products’ aftermarkets?](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHwE0es_m0lzJpedp0KFtKOYBne_M3YPJ-qwQxiY_YMkHffLAAXkSW9F-pjQFKsy5kJJ-VWScQQkuEVb5-BxnDv10XIMAbYhvgzBSQadD1gdTiIjg9-Oj9Iekll-C3Ca9I76uI3Hh5nCI4QyLosLSNev9VzLq9lF1jM86ungheEDOBKLzGTbE3yw/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Flat rates supported by clauses on universality of repertoire in contracts between CMOs and users are anti-competitive, says Spanish Competition Authority](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpBg7o3d7DPzH4YqNz3DUV5J5_sS4P7X7ZznFNETyQlLe0gonaSi3eE_jdjHD_aIjbPKhgpvUrkg6tPprYQYdwDGiyuWIXty9BOUlc07wUVbjDxI1bHoVxZA0ZCC9HBPjLXQwUioBSd9e9n-Z3uCeJ9UUgEvtJHLo1AllR20HGJETFdKoovxLBMw/s72-c/images.png)
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html