Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / TM PAPER IN NEED OF SOME CRITICISM, PLEASE

TM PAPER IN NEED OF SOME CRITICISM, PLEASE

-

IPKat co-master Jeremy has been labouring for the past few days in trying to write a conference paper on the European Court of Justice's attitude to "likelihood of confusion" in EU trade mark law. He has got as far as a fairly advanced draft and now welcomes comments, however critical, from anyone who wants to take the trouble to read the paper. If you'd like to see it, click here and a copy will be duly dispatched. The paper is to be given later this week at Fordham University's Annual International Intellectual Property Law and Policy conference in New York (click here for details).

The joys of confusion here and here
Word confusion here and here
Consumer confusion here
TM PAPER IN NEED OF SOME CRITICISM, PLEASE TM PAPER IN NEED OF SOME CRITICISM, PLEASE Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, March 28, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.