HOW MANY TM LAWYERS ...? ANOTHER COMPETITION


How many trade mark lawyers ...?

Trade Marks at the Limit is a collection of essays on the extent to which you can make legal use of other people's trade marks even if you don't have permisssion. It will be published by Edward Elgar in the next couple of weeks. The idea for this book was not exclusively its editor's idea: it originated from a number of discussions between the two katmeisters back in 2003-4, when they were working on what eventually became Trade Mark Use.

To mark the publication of Trade Marks at the Limit the IPKat is running a How Many Trade Mark Lawyers Competition, the prize being a free copy of the book. The rules are simple: the person who submits the best answer to the question "How many trade mark lawyers does it take to change a lightbulb?" by mid-day (British Summer Time) on Monday 15 May 2006 is the winner. You can enter as many times as you like, the sole condition being that you grant the IPKat a non-exclusive licence to publish your submissions on his weblog for the full duration of the copyright term. Please send your submissions here.

Full details of the book here.
Examples of lightbulb jokes here and here
HOW MANY TM LAWYERS ...? ANOTHER COMPETITION HOW MANY TM LAWYERS ...?  ANOTHER COMPETITION Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, April 28, 2006 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. The "How many ...." light bulbs items are American biased as they indicate the use of ES socket light bulbs and the US vernacular for ..... I am reminded of the US joke: Q "What is the difference between a girl and a light bulb?" A "You can unscrew a light bulb." This joke fully illustrates the transatlantic divide.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right, it is US-biased - but we live in an Americanised world. Some of the responses already received have assumed that the competition said "screw" instead of "change".

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.