Indip
The IPKat has been following with keen interest the activities of the recently-formed group of sole and small intellectual property practitioners. He notes with pleasure that, thanks to the good offices of Philip Cooper (Crossguard), they have set up a forum on which they can network, at www.indip.net (informally, the Independent Intellectual Property Network). The network has been configured so that anyone can join as a member. Once you've joined, the system will send you a validation email with a link to click on - which you need to do before you can post on the forum. Philip warns that you may need to wait a little while for this to happen.
Right: small practices have a lot to offer each other - and their clients
If any member posts anything, the system will automatically email him or her with any subsequent posts in the same thread, but it will be necessary to log on from time to time, e.g. once a day, to check for any new posts – you can click on ‘view posts since last visit’ in the top right hand corner of the forums page to get only new posts since you last visited.
Latest IAM
No, not "I am" but "IAM" - issue 18, the July/August issue of Intellectual Asset Management, published bimonthly by Globe White Page, which has now hit the streets. Its cover story, "Time to Break Free", asks why the world needs a new type of IP manager (Merpel notes - if the cover illustration is anything to go by, he is male and wears a white shirt: not much change there ...).
More seriously, there is a good piece on prospecting for the IP assets of bankrupt businesses, an almost upbeat feature on the recent none-too-successful San Francisco patent auction and some portentious warnings about a pear-shaped future for Amgen if its NF-kB protein patent (portrayed in symbolic form, right) withers on the vine of US patent litigation.
Free inspection copy of IAM here
INDIP; LATEST IAM
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html