THE POPE DENOUNCES INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS


The Pope denounces International Designs Agreement

The IPKat has just learned of two new developments relating to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs. First, the Holy See (a.k.a. the Vatican) has announced that it is denouncing the London Act of the Hague Agreement, with effect from 4 August 2007, from which date the mini-state will cease to be a member of the Hague Union.

The IPKat is concerned at the Holy See's increasing isolation from the rest of the world, noting that it is only one of eight countries that has failed to become a member of the world's premier international body, FIFA. Says Merpel, I've heard of Papal Nuncios before, but never Papal Denuncios ...

Left: Members of the Holy See's soccer squad posing in their original home strip (1506), which is in dire need of a makeover.

Better news for international design enthusiasts is however close at hand. The Republic of Mali is signing up for the Hague Agreement itself, with effect from 7 September 2006.

Right: Mali's new football strip, modelled here, reputedly designed by soccer star turned fashion guru David Beckham and his wife Victoria

Hague Agreement: the text
Hague Agreement: list of members
THE POPE DENOUNCES INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS THE POPE DENOUNCES INTERNATIONAL DESIGNS Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, August 11, 2006 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. The Vatican isolated? Any truth the rumor of a Vatican nuclear weapons program? Is a rouge state?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Any indications as to why the Vatican shuns the Hague Agreement? Surely it's not because they have an important industry of counterfeit designer goods?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.