Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / EIPRs

EIPRs


The IPKat has been remiss in failing to note the contents of the December European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) - so much so that the January issue is already out. He now seeks to rectify that omission:

December 2006
  • Alex Weedon on material transfer agreements
  • Pt 2 of IPKat co-bm Ilanah's article on the introduction of performers' moral rights
  • Nicholas Briggs on patent entitlement
  • Pt 1 of Thomas Hays' article on secondary copyright liability

  • Lee-Ann Tong on South African computer program copyright
  • Herman Cohen Jehoram on Dutch perfume copyright

January 2007

  • Thomas Riis and Jens Schovsbo on copyright and users
  • John Hull on academic collaborations and IP
  • Pt 2 of Thomas Hays' article (see above)
  • Anne Bateman on copyright implications of TVs in hotel rooms
  • Campbell Thomas andBill Ladas on Aussie TM protection for colours
  • An obit of Professor Zheng

An of course, the usual book reviews of case reports can be found in both issues.

EIPRs EIPRs Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 03, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.