Happier at reporting the news than making it, IPKat team blogger Jeremy is obliged to flash the limelight briefly on himself and report that, from 1 June, he will be working as Intellectual Property Consultant to UK top thirty law firm Olswang. He will be based in that firm's London office in Holborn, a stone's throw from Lincoln's Inn in the capital's IP heartland.
Right: the IPKat tests out the office equipment at his new consultancy
While Jeremy looks forward to teaming up again with Nigel Swycher and to meeting his new colleagues, he'd like to take this opportunity to say a very public thank you to Slaughter and May for the tremendous support and encouragement which that firm has given him over the past 13 years. It has been a pleasure and a privilege to work there, where he has made many good and valued friends.
Olswang press release here; coverage in The Lawyer here and in Legal Week here
Right: the IPKat tests out the office equipment at his new consultancy
While Jeremy looks forward to teaming up again with Nigel Swycher and to meeting his new colleagues, he'd like to take this opportunity to say a very public thank you to Slaughter and May for the tremendous support and encouragement which that firm has given him over the past 13 years. It has been a pleasure and a privilege to work there, where he has made many good and valued friends.
Olswang press release here; coverage in The Lawyer here and in Legal Week here
Kat in the limelight - briefly
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, May 14, 2007
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html