The IPKat has just heard about the WIPO Guide on Managing Intellectual Property For Museums, which appears to have been launched today (you can read it in full here).
Right, and below Left: museum architecture by the incredibly gifted Daniel Libeskind
According to the Executive summary,
There's a lot to read - and a lot of thinking to do. The IPKat thinks it's strange that, while so much pressure is being brought to bear on the easy availability, downloading and multicopying of cultural not-yet-heritage items as CDs and DVDs, such careful thought is being given to the controlled exploitation of cultural heritage items that have already slipped into the public domain - if they were ever in the private domain in the first place. Merpel adds, are we talking about a sort of paying public domain for culturally significant materials?
Note by Lovells on museums' IP rights in the digital environment here
CIPIL virtual museum of intellectual property here
Whipple Museum of the History of Science copyright notice here
Cat museum magnets here
Right, and below Left: museum architecture by the incredibly gifted Daniel Libeskind
According to the Executive summary,
"In the digital age, the cultural heritage community [The IPKat asks, aren't we all stakeholder in the cultural heritage - isn't that something to do with civilisation?] is increasingly faced with the responsibility of managing its own IP internally, as well as managing uses by third parties and users throughout the world, often on diminishing budgets. Effective use of the IP system allows museums to meet international standards of best practice, and can offer significant opportunities to leverage their goodwill, authenticity, uniqueness [The IPKat says, the usual way of leveraging authenticity and uniqueness seems to be by making picture postcards and models of artefacts, which doesn't do much for either of those vaunted assets] and scholarly expertise to generate a return on investment.Right: an icon of the past: the Natural History Museum, London
The first part of the Guide describes IP issues of relevance to museums such as rights in scholarly content, technologies developed in-house [The IPKat says, this is something that's easy to overlook, since it's often viewed as tangential to museum management], and branding tools that provide recognition and awareness of the museum in a commercial context. It also sets out recommended best practices in managing IP to enable a museum to identify its IP, understand its rights in using its collections, and strengthen its ability to deal with critical IP issues as they arise. The second part of the Guide reviews existing business models that could provide museums with appropriate opportunities to create sustainable funding, and deliver on their stated objectives.
The WIPO-commissioned author of the guide – Mrs Rina Elster Pantalony – is a recognized Canadian expert in the field of museums and cultural heritage institutions. Her biography is available for reference.
For any questions about the WIPO Guide, or WIPO’s activities in relation to museums, please contact the WIPO Copyright and Related Rights Sector, at copyright.mail@wipo.int, or tel: +41 22 338 8138".
There's a lot to read - and a lot of thinking to do. The IPKat thinks it's strange that, while so much pressure is being brought to bear on the easy availability, downloading and multicopying of cultural not-yet-heritage items as CDs and DVDs, such careful thought is being given to the controlled exploitation of cultural heritage items that have already slipped into the public domain - if they were ever in the private domain in the first place. Merpel adds, are we talking about a sort of paying public domain for culturally significant materials?
Note by Lovells on museums' IP rights in the digital environment here
CIPIL virtual museum of intellectual property here
Whipple Museum of the History of Science copyright notice here
Cat museum magnets here
WIPO Guide to managing IP for museums
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, August 01, 2007
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html