
Other things you'll find in this issue include
* "Managing generic competition and patent strategies in the pharmaceutical industriy" by the Addleshaw Goddard triumvirate of Brian Whitehead, Stuart Jackson and Richard Kempner;
* An unusual piece by 7 New Square barrister and head of chambers John Fitzgerald, reviewing the extent to which the "innocent infringement" plea assists a defendant in unregistered design right litigation in England and Ireland;
Read this editorial in full here on Afro-IP
* "Sealing the cracks" -- a review by LA attorney and legal scholar Christopher T. Varas of current cybersquatting practices and some of the things that can be done to address them.
Read all the editorials of the past twelve months here
Full contents of this issue here
For free sample, click here; to subscribe, click here; to write, click here
50 most-read articles since 2005 here

While on the subject of Microsoft, and therefore law and information technology, let's welcome volume 16 no.1, the Spring 2008 issue of Oxford University Press's seriously cerebral International Journal of Law and Information Technology. Among the must-read items for IP enthusiasts this time round are
* Warren B. Chik's "Lord of Your Domain, But Master of None: The Need to Harmonize and Recalibrate the Domain Name Regime of Ownership and Control" (abstract here). The great thing about long titles -- and this one has 22 words in it -- is that they rarely keep you guessing long about what they're about ...;Right: many fear that business method patents will lead to sharp practice in Australian trading circles* Judith McNamara and Lucy Cradduck, "Can We Protect How We Do What We Do? A Consideration of Business Method Patents in Australia and Europe" (abstract here). The title is a mere 19 words, but the article is nonetheless well worth reading.
Contents of current issue here
Recent periodicals
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Friday, April 04, 2008
Rating:

No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html