The IPKat's friend and fellow blogger, Shireen Smith (Azrights Solicitors and the IP-Lite -- soon to be relaunching as IP Brands -- and SOLO IP weblogs) is hoping to boost her North London firm's IP litigation capacity. She'd like to hear from any IP litigators who are looking for an opportunity -- including those IP litigators who may have recently retired but are looking for a new challenge, as well as those who might prefer to be home-based (Shireen tells the Kat that her business model is designed for home-working, being paperless and using appropriate IT for remote working). If you're interested, you can contact Shireen here.
Having mentioned SOLO IP just a moment ago, the IPKat would like to draw readers' attention to the informal sole and small IP practitioners' group's next meeting, in London on Wednesday 10 September. Keynote speaker is Stuart Greenhill (Small & Mid Law Market Champion, for LexisNexis), who promises to do some listening as well as some speaking. It costs nothing to attend and all are welcome. Further details can be found here.
Having mentioned SOLO IP just a moment ago, the IPKat would like to draw readers' attention to the informal sole and small IP practitioners' group's next meeting, in London on Wednesday 10 September. Keynote speaker is Stuart Greenhill (Small & Mid Law Market Champion, for LexisNexis), who promises to do some listening as well as some speaking. It costs nothing to attend and all are welcome. Further details can be found here.
Small and sole ...
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Sunday, August 03, 2008
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html