UK IPO website -- your chance to have a say

Late this summer, IPKat team blogger Jeremy -- who excoriated both the last batch of amendments to the UK IPO's website and the manner in which the changes were sprung on its most regular users -- spent a couple of highly enjoyable hours trying out the beta version of the latest, redesigned site which the UK IPO is just fine-tuning pending what (it hopes) will be a launch in the next few weeks.
Right: after the survey, don't forget to leave time for some social networking (photo from Dolittler)

Well, the Kat is pleased to announce that the UK IPO is taking a very serious interest in understanding users' needs. To this end, the Office is asking readers of this weblog to complete a card-sort survey, the results of which will help it to shape its IP professional pages. The card sort exercise should not take more than 10 minutes to complete (Merpel says you should be able to do it in 5) and the UK IPO will be most grateful for your help. The process may take a little longer if you want to add your personal comments when you complete the survey ...

For patents, click here
For trade marks, click: here
For designs, click here
UK IPO website -- your chance to have a say UK IPO website -- your chance to have a say Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, November 07, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.