The IPKat isn't impressed. How can it be bad faith to use your own name? Moreover, he doubts that there is that much advantage for Sir Allen in associating cricket with a US university - our transatlantic cousins are gifted in many ways, but generally not in the relationship between willow and leather.
The IPKat isn't impressed. How can it be bad faith to use your own name? Moreover, he doubts that there is that much advantage for Sir Allen in associating cricket with a US university - our transatlantic cousins are gifted in many ways, but generally not in the relationship between willow and leather.
Depending on the circumstances, I suppose using your own name could be bad faith. In Germany Helmut Rothschild (no ties to THE Rothschild family) started a line of accessories under the 'Rothschild' name. This was so clearly an attempt to cash in on consumer confusion and to feeride that he was rightfully stopped from using 'Rothschild' - even though it was his name.
ReplyDeleteMmmm... As an American I'd have to say there is a decent likelihood of confusion. Stanford is indeed widely known for its sports programs, and also regarded as pompous enough* for the public to believe it might attempt cricket. (It already fields a rugby team, albeit not well...)
ReplyDelete(There's also potential confusion with the term "Stanford Quad," which in the US describes the main focal point of the Stanford campus.)
While I generally hate to see someone sued for using their own name, the university may have a point that it looks like Sir Allen has been trying to capitalize on the university's identity. Whereas if he called his events "Sir Allen Stanford's Cricket" he could probably avoid the confusion altogether.
* I can say this. I went to rival UC Berkeley. Go Bears!