The IPKat's studious friend Nicola Rathbone is currently gathering data which she needs for some original research that will go into her Masters Thesis at Cranfield University.
Right: never mind those silly computers -- no traditional designer should be without a fully-functional pencil case (this one's available from mozaec here)
Nicola writes:
"Research in 2006 showed that, while intellectual property is the core product of the design industry, this fact is rarely recognised in the fee structure, with 97% of companies choosing to bill for time instead of intellectual property rights. Research also suggests that, when IPR is included as part of a business model, there are significant benefits both to the designer and their clients.
This project seeks to explore the underlying reasons for the inability of the creative industries fully to exploit IPR in their business model and to examine how to integrate IPR successfully into their business models in the future. This should encourage greater and more successfully focused IP activity within the design community.
This survey is to examine how the creative industries use intellectual property Rights in order to generate income from their ideas, over and and above fees charged on a time/project basis. It also looks at attitudes and understanding around intellectual property. The responses will be used to help create a diagnostic tool that will enable those creating IP, particularly in digital and communications sector, to integrate IP rights into their business model.
This survey is only 10 questions long and will enable the diagnostic tool to be effectively tailored to the needs of those in the digital and communications sector of the creative industries. Your help is greatly appreciated".If you can help Nicola, you'll find her survey here. In return, Nicola has promised to give followers of this weblog a reader-friendly account of her thoughts and conclusions.
IP in the creative industries (particularly design) - how you can help
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, August 05, 2009
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html