As previously reported on the IP Finance weblog, work has been continuing on a Draft Supplement to the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions dealing with security rights in intellectual property, as revised further to the April-May 2009 session of the UNCITRAL Working Group VI (Security Interests) and the approval of the insolvency discussion by the UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency Law) at its May 2009 session. This Draft Supplement forms the basis for discussions at the next session of Working Group VIwhich is coming up very soon (Vienna, 2-6 November 2009).
As an aid to better understanding of the proposed Supplement and the practical issues which it raises for both lenders and IP borrowers, IP Finance has announced a seminar from 2pm to 6pm on 14 October 2009 at the London office of Olswang LLP (here). Spiros Bazinas (Senior Legal Officer, UNCITRAL's International Trade Law Division) has kindly agreed to address the seminar, following which a panel comprising both financial and IP interests will comment. There will then follow a question-and-answer session in which all participants will be invited to seek explanations and clarification. To aid the smooth running of the seminar, all who attend will receive two 4-side memos, one written from the perspective of the lender, the other from the perspective of the IP sector, which will crystallise the issues.
Professor Graham Penn, a banking partner in Sidley Austin LLP with particular expertise in securitisation, will chair the seminar and the panellists (for which the final list is still being finalised) include Mark Bezant (FTI Consulting), Nigel Page (Financial Editor, Intellectual Asset Management) and Ben Goodger (Rouse Legal). There's no admission charge but, if you'd like to attend, please email Sandra Holloway here. If you want to read up on this topic, all the publicly available UNCITRAL documents on the subject can be accessed here. For those who attend, 2.45 CPD points are available (ref. DIY/OLSW).
As an aid to better understanding of the proposed Supplement and the practical issues which it raises for both lenders and IP borrowers, IP Finance has announced a seminar from 2pm to 6pm on 14 October 2009 at the London office of Olswang LLP (here). Spiros Bazinas (Senior Legal Officer, UNCITRAL's International Trade Law Division) has kindly agreed to address the seminar, following which a panel comprising both financial and IP interests will comment. There will then follow a question-and-answer session in which all participants will be invited to seek explanations and clarification. To aid the smooth running of the seminar, all who attend will receive two 4-side memos, one written from the perspective of the lender, the other from the perspective of the IP sector, which will crystallise the issues.
Professor Graham Penn, a banking partner in Sidley Austin LLP with particular expertise in securitisation, will chair the seminar and the panellists (for which the final list is still being finalised) include Mark Bezant (FTI Consulting), Nigel Page (Financial Editor, Intellectual Asset Management) and Ben Goodger (Rouse Legal). There's no admission charge but, if you'd like to attend, please email Sandra Holloway here. If you want to read up on this topic, all the publicly available UNCITRAL documents on the subject can be accessed here. For those who attend, 2.45 CPD points are available (ref. DIY/OLSW).
Seminar on UNCITRAL and security rights in IP
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html