Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!
The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!
The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).
Despite the concerns expressed by the United States and the European Union, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has decided to allow the creation of new generic Top Level Domains such as ".brand" or ".city". The slick video above produced by ICANN gives you some elementary info (if you prefer reading, ICANN's FAQ on the new gTLD may help).
Two important points from a trade mark owners' point of view are the requests of the US and EU to (a) eliminate the requirement proof of' “use” of the trademark for users of Sunrise, URS (Uniform Rapid Suspension System) and PPDRP (Post Delegation Dispute Resolution Protocol); (b) change the burdens of proof in URS and PDDRP from clear and convincing evidence to preponderance of the evidence. The ICANN board has declined to follow these suggestions on the rationale that the requirement of use deters gaming of the system and the higher standard of proof is appropriate in view of the drastic consequences of a positive decision in URS and PDDRP proceedings. Make sure your proof of use documents are up to date and accessible on short notice.
Another area of disagreement is the cross-ownership of registrars (those accredited to register domains in a TLD) and registry providers (those who keep the database of domain names, and generate the zone files which convert domain names to IP addresses, such as Nominet for .uk). Both the EU and the US fear anti-competitive effects if cross-ownership is permitted, but ICANN is undeterred. European Commission Vice President and Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes has made it very clear that she is unhappy about ICANNs decision to allow cross-ownership. It is open to speculation what, if anything, the Government Advisory Committee will do about ICANN's ignoring its advice.
Afilias, a registry services provider, has published a brochure and a short film on the strategic aspects of the new TLDs entitled "Envisioning Your .Brand New World: A Field Guide for Brand Builders.". While there is commercial intent behind these resources, they are nonetheless a useful primer on the importance of the new TLDs for brand owners. Namely, you will have a period at the beginning of 2012 (as currently planned, has been postponed often) to submit a request to administer your own TLD registry to ICANN, and it is unclear when there will be another opportunity once this window has closed. That means that brand owners may have to decide whether they want to administer their own gTLD name space - which is quite costly (the application fee is USD 185,000, but it has been estimated that the whole process costs up to USD 1 mio. if you don't have the skills to run a registry in-house) - before they know what their competitors are doing; or to put it more bluntly, before they know whether owning your own TLD is hot or not.
If you want more in-depth information, the official Applicant Guidebook, which has undergone six revisions and gone from 97 to 360 pages, should provide you with all the details (note that it is still a draft and has not been officially put in force).
On a related note, IPKat has previously reported that the WIPO is very unhappy about ICANN's plans to reform the UDRP, and Eric Wilbers, Director of WIPOs Arbitration and Mediation Center, has re-iterated this position in an open letter dated 15 July 2011. The key message is "the UDRP should be left to do its job".
Even if it wished to do so, IPKat could not apply for the .cat TLD - because that is reserved for Catalonia, or rather, "the Catalonian speaking community irrespective of its geographic location" (because of "the reluctance of certain Catalan institutions, companies and people to use .es, .ad, .fr, .it domains"...). Websites accessible under a domain name in the .cat TLD must substantially be in Catalonian, and we believe they don't refer to meowing.
New Top Level Domains are here to come, get used to it
Reviewed by Mark Schweizer
on
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Rating: 5
As ICANN won't allow applications from individuals or sole proprietors, effectively ignoring the interests and needs of most Internet users.
ICANN's main aim has always been to convince Internet users they're the only game in town and then try and herd everyone into a tiny part of an infinite universe. However, people are finding there are other options and that's why Alternatives have grown in popularity.
Anyone can create Top Level Domains at no cost & without reference to ICANN, simply by registering NON-ICANN Dashcom (not Dotcom) domain names. Dashcoms are memorable & relevant web addresses like "games-com", "music-store" and “basket-ball”
Here is a part of the Internet that’s totally outside ICANN's control that exists quite happily alongside it. Currently resolution is via an APP, but ISP links are coming to negate that need. It’s only a matter of time before other new options surface, and none of them will have anything to do with ICANN.
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
The IPKat: Intellectual Property News and Fun for Everyone!
How many page-views has the IPKat received?
Not just any old IPKat ...
* "Most Popular Intellectual Property Law Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, November 2024.
* "Most Popular Copyright Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, November 2024.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati has been quoted, and the IPKat has also been hyperlinked on the New York Times, April 2024.
* "Best UK Intellectual Property blog" of all time according to FeedSpot, January 2024.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati and The IPKat are expressly recommended as sources to follow to get an "unstuffy look at IP issues" according to Legal Business, April 2023.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati listed as one of the World Intellectual Property Review's "Influential Women in IP" of 2020.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosatilisted as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2018.
* IPKat founder and Blogmeister Emeritus Jeremy Phillips listed as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2005, 2011, 2013, and 2014.
* Recommended by the European Patent Office as reading material for candidates for the European Qualifying Examinations, 2013.
* Listed as "Top Legal Blog" in The Times Online, March 2011.
* One of the only two non-US blogs listed in the Blawg 2010 ABA Journal100.
* Court Reporter Top Copyright Blog award winner, November 2010.
* Number 1 in the 2010 Top Copyright Blog list compiled by the Copyright Litigation Blog, July 2010.
* Selected by the United States Library of Congress for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs as of 2010.
* Top Patent Blog poll 2009: 3rd out of 50 in the "Favourite Patent Blog" poll and 2nd out of 50 in the "Most-read" poll.
* ComputerWeekly IT Law and Governance Blog of the Year, 20 August 2008.
* Best of the Blogs, Times Online, 21 August 2008.
Get the Kat in your Inbox!
Over 16,400 readers already subscribe to the IPKat by email.
To subscribeclick here and enter your preferred e-mail address.
Any problems, please let the IPKat team know.
The Kat that tweets! Current followers: 22.9K
To follow the IPKat team's posts and comments on X (formerly Twitter), just click here Follow @Ipkat
Surely you'd want .kat anyway!?
ReplyDeleteNew Top Level Domains....But Not For You....
ReplyDeleteAs ICANN won't allow applications from individuals or sole proprietors, effectively ignoring the interests and needs of most Internet users.
ICANN's main aim has always been to convince Internet users they're the only game in town and then try and herd everyone into a tiny part of an infinite universe. However, people are finding there are other options and that's why Alternatives have grown in popularity.
Anyone can create Top Level Domains at no cost & without reference to ICANN, simply by registering NON-ICANN Dashcom (not Dotcom) domain names. Dashcoms are memorable & relevant web addresses like "games-com", "music-store" and “basket-ball”
Here is a part of the Internet that’s totally outside ICANN's control that exists quite happily alongside it. Currently resolution is via an APP, but ISP links are coming to negate that need. It’s only a matter of time before other new options surface, and none of them will have anything to do with ICANN.