In 1979, the EPO
started an occasional column in the Official Journal entitled “Legal Advice
from the EPO”. The first instalment dealt with the practice of refunding of the examination
fee where the application was terminated before examination commenced. The
purpose of the column was explained as follows:
In this column replies are published to enquiries of general interest. In line with the informative purpose suggested by the title of this column the intention is to give prominence to formal matters of procedure. The legal information supplied therein is in no way binding on the competent departments of the European Patent Office, especially the Boards of Appeal and the Enlarged Board of Appeal respectively.
Arnie, not having heard the news, continues to struggle with Legal Advice No. 5/93 "Calculation of Aggregate Time Limits" |
Despite that disclaimer,
the “Legal Advice” notices became an integral part of the operation of the
Office and for candidates studying for the exams to become a European Patent
Attorney, they were required knowledge. In all, nineteen notices (not including
revisions) issued over the years, but since 1999 there have been no brand new
notices.
Now, the President
of the EPO has cancelled all of the Legal Advice notices, on the grounds that their
content now appears in the Guidelines for Examination, where it had not already
been made redundant by changes to law and practice.
The details are as
follows:
Article 1Cancellation of Legal AdviceAll Legal Advice notices shall be cancelled. Particular reference is made to:- No. 4/80 (OJ EPO 1980, 48 - no longer relevant)- No. 8/80 (OJ EPO 1981, 6 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 11/82 (OJ EPO 1982, 57 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 13/82 (OJ EPO 1982, 196 - no longer relevant)- No. 3/85 (OJ EPO 1985, 347 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 16/85 (OJ EPO 1985, 141 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 17/90 (OJ EPO 1990, 260 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 6/91 rev. (OJ EPO 1991, 573 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 10/92 rev. (OJ EPO 1992, 662 - no longer relevant)- No. 5/93 (OJ EPO 1993, 229 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 19/99 (OJ EPO 1999, 296 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)- No. 15/05 rev. 2 (OJ EPO 2005, 357 - incorporated in the Guidelines for Examination)
Article 2Entry into forceThis decision shall enter into force on 20 June 2012.
No more Legal Advice from the EPO
Reviewed by David Brophy
on
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html