|
Michael Phelps for Vuitton No1 |
Record-breaking and recently retired swimmer Michael Phelps, the most decorated Olympian
of all time with 22 medals, is now apparently in trouble over an ad campaign
for Louis Vuitton which may result in him losing all his medals (four gold and
two silver) from the London 2012 Games, reports the Daily Mail.
Last 13 August, two photos of
Phelps by Annie Leibovitz appeared on Twitter. One
of them is a portrait of Phelps in a
bathtub, wearing swimwear and goggles, while the other one depicts him wearing
a three-piece suit and sitting on a couch with former Soviet gymnast Larisa Latynina, whose
record for most overall medals he broke at the London Games, explains The Washington Post.
Apparently, the publication of
these photos was in breach of Rule 40 of the International
Olympic Committee (IOC), according to which
|
Michael Phelps for Vuitton No 2 |
"Except as permitted by the IOC Executive Board,
no competitor, coach, trainer or official who participates in the Olympic Games
may allow his person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for
advertising purposes during the Olympic Games." [For the "Olympic Games", Rule 40 applied
from 18 July 2012 until three days after the Closing Ceremony for
the Games – 15 August 2012]
Participants who do not comply with Rule 40 may
be sanctioned by the IOC and/or by the British Olympic Association (BOA)
in accordance with the Team Members’ Agreement (which provides for wide
ranging sanctions, including amongst other things, removal of
accreditation and financial penalties). Rule 23 of the Olympic Charter
allows sanctions including, ultimately, disqualification from the Games
and/or withdrawal of the participant’s accreditation.
Now the point is to clarify whether the
photographs were leaked intentionally by Vuitton or whether, instead, they were
divulged without Vuitton and the athlete's permission.
|
Blake and his Mille watch |
Vuitton has already declared that the two photos
were unofficial images and were stolen from the company.
Similarly, Phelps' agent Peter Carlysle
dismissed any suggestion that the swimmer may have violated Rule 40, reports The Huffington Post. "He didn't violate Rule 40, it's as simple as that", Carlisle said. "All that matters is
whether the athlete permitted that use. That's all he can control. In this
case, Michael did not authorize that use. The images hadn't even been reviewed,
much less approved. It's as simple as that. An athlete can't control
unauthorized uses any more than you can guarantee someone isn't going to break
into your house."
The Kats have written extensively about ambush
marketing concerns during the Olympics (eg here), as have newspapers. Reports from the competitions have
also highlighted the strict IOC policy.
|
Many athletes were just too afraid of infringing Rule 40 |
For instance, during the 100m semifinals and finals,
Jamaican sprinter Yohan Blake attracted
more attention from the IOC because of what he wore rather than for how he
performed. The athlete wore in fact a $500,000 Richard Mille customised watch,
thus contravening IOC rule that athletes are only allowed to wear gear that is
part of their country's sponsored apparel, reports TNT. Similarly, if athletes use a piece of equipment that
is not strictly clothing, they are required to use the official sponsor of
the Olympics in that category. As far as watches are concerned, Omega was the
official watchmaker of the London 2012 edition. By wearing a Mille watch, also Blake acted in breach of IOC
Rule 40 and may face a fine for this.
Going back to Phelps, this Kat
believes that it is unlikely that he will lose any of his London medals.
However, now that the Games
are over, it may be worth discussing whether IOC anti-ambush marketing policy is a good one or
whether, instead, as commented by Sports Business "Rule 40 is
great for the Olympics ... 20 years ago. In today's marketing world, where
athletes are featured in commercials, billboards, and in print ads, it's no
longer feasible. Athletes like Michael Phelps, Ryan Lochte, Gabby
Douglas, and Usain [B]olt are marketing gold for high-profile companies. While
Missy Franklin has maintained her amateur title, she's one of the few. However,
the IOC won't be doing away with Rule 40 anytime soon. While it was front and
center during these Olympics, many fans outside of the [T]witter world didn't
take notice."
There is of course the rumour that the photos were leaked by Ms. Latynina. Thus, her record would not be broken, if the six medals are taken from Phelps...
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I think the stress would be on "allow", and from what I have read also in other papers the contract clearly stated use after 16th August.
Interesting, the way the anti-ambush marketing policy is becoming ridiculous due to exaggeration!
"All that matters is whether the athlete permitted that use.
ReplyDeleteThe answer is very simple.......... do nothing in 'the games' other than compete......... I guess smoking a bong in Australia was a good message for sports !
sometimes I wonder whether the "olympic rules" in the way they are now exaggerated might be in a clash with antitrust law altogehter.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I didn't follow the olympics, with my lack of interest for watching sports additionally fueled by what I perceive as absolutely intolerable market behaviour. Thus I can't really tell.