Old Yahoo! logo |
Mayer's intends to restore
Yahoo!'s stature as a technological innovator and has already brought
about some changes in the organisation of the internet corporation.
Besides the
idea of providing every employee with a new smartphone, Mayer has in
fact decided to change something also in the Yahoo! brand, which was launched
back in 1995.
As reported by The Huffington Post, the CEO has thught
of getting rid of the ® symbol after 'Yahoo!'. This has been part of
the brand since the very beginning.
Posting
an image of one of the lost ®s on Instagram, Mayer said:
"One of our new
Yahoo!s Andrew was really bugged by the registered trademark symbol at the end
of our logo; he's gone on a mission removing all the R's from our site and our
campus. This is one on the random R's we pulled off a wall :)".
"Legal
assures us that our trademark is
implied and quite secure :)".
TechCrunch suspects that this decision was based on the consideration that at the moment it is difficult to find a successful internet
company with a ® tacked on to its logo. Hence, also the days of the
characteristic exclamation mark which follows the word "Yahoo" may be numbered.
This blogger
ventures to say that this could be because:
1) the use of
punctuation is a peculiarly human approach. For instance, until very recently
Google ignored all punctuation
symbols when indexing pages. It is just since late 2011 that Google has started indexing seven punctuation
marks (%, $, \, ., #, +). The exclamation
mark remains among the non-indexed symbols.
2) the
domain name is www.yahoo.com.
While Yahoo! is dropping its ®, Bernie is committed to drop ½ pound |
Going back to
the now missing ® symbol after "Yahoo!", it is worth recalling
that §1111 of the US Lanham (Trademark) Act provides that:
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 22 hereof [15 USC 1072], a registrant of a mark registered in the Patent Office, may give notice that his mark is
registered by displaying with the mark the words "Registered in U. S.
Patent and Trademark Office" or "Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off."
or the letter R enclosed within a circle, thus (R); and in any suit for
infringement under this Act by such a registrant failing to give such notice of
registration, no profits and no damages shall be recovered under the provisions
of this Act unless the defendant had actual notice of the registration.
It is apparent that the ® symbol is not completely
meaningless. It is actually relevant to the innocent infringement defence. Whilst failing to provide notice of a US registered trademark is not a defence to infringement, it may nonetheless limit or eliminate the damages available to a plaintiff and is relevant also to the theme of injunctions going forward forcing the defendant to stop using the trademark.
Yahoo!® drops "®". Is "!" next?
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html