Still not The Aardvark, but never mind. This Kat was convinced that there are enough law journals in the world with truly boring and descriptive names, and that the South African Intellectual Property Law Journal (SAIPLJ) should truly be called The Aardvark, a name which would not only guarantee it instant distinctiveness in IP circles but would send it straight to the top of any list of must-read IP titles. Alas, this noble and gratuitous suggestion was ignored, but the Kat still welcomes, with pleasure and no small degree of magnanimity, the one and only SAIPLJ. Do please visit its website, take a look at the finished project and enjoy it. Congratulations to all who have dreamed the dream and toiled to bring that dream to fruition.
Free next week? Fancy a focus? Nigel Clarke (Head of Unit Online Products and User Support, European Patent Office) has emailed the IPKat with the following request:
Threats seminar: still some places available. Last month the IPKat posted an item to the effect that there was an impending seminar on making groundless threats to sue good folk for infringing someone else's intellectual property rights. Julia Jarzabkowski (Team Lawyer, Law Commission for England and Wales) told the Kats:
Around the weblogs. The 1709 Blog carries a reader's question concerning proxy sites, VPNs and the circumvention of website blocking orders to stop copyright infringement here. PatLit features two great posts from former guest Kat Stefano Barazza, one reviewing a US report on inconsistent IP policies of standard-setting bodies, the other on patent infringement as anticompetitive activity. Sally Cooper takes a look at Scotland's go-it-alone IP prospects on the SOLO IP blog (incidentally, that blog got 450 visits last week, the highest figure in recent memory), while Art & Artifice's Angela Saltarelli ponders over possible moral rights issues arising from interference with Banksy's iconic graffiti, here.
Do you litigate patents? This may be for you. Next week, on 10 and 11 December to be precise, IBC Legal Conferences is offering its "International Patent Litigation 2013", the fifth annual event of this title to be offered and, this Kat is certain, definitely not the last. Taking place at the Crowne Plaza London St James, London, and blessed with a fine cast of speakers -- including many of the IPKat's friends from near and far -- this event offers a tasty 10% discount for all IPKat readers who register for the event and quote the VIP Katcode FKW82435IPK. Click here for programme details and registration. Bring your own prejudices: reality check provided.
"We are looking for volunteers to take part in some focus groups to help us build an App for Espacenet – the EPO’s patent database. If selected, the volunteers will receive £80 for their trouble. The focus groups will be scheduled as follows: London, UK, Pullman London St Pancras [don't be fooled, says Merpel, this Pullman is an hotel, not a train] (opposite the British Library), 100-110 Euston Road, London NW1 2AJ, 9 December 2013 at 8.00, 17.30 and 19.30 and on 10 December 2013 at 8.00, 17.30 and 19.30. More information is available here.
Would you be able to post this invitation on your excellent blog?"Yes, indeed, purr the Kats in unison, urging their readers to seize this never-to-be-remembered opportunity ...
Threats seminar: still some places available. Last month the IPKat posted an item to the effect that there was an impending seminar on making groundless threats to sue good folk for infringing someone else's intellectual property rights. Julia Jarzabkowski (Team Lawyer, Law Commission for England and Wales) told the Kats:
"We are being hosted by DAC Beachcroft for a seminar and discussion on what the responses to the recent [Law Commission] consultation on groundless threats [on which see here] has thrown up. We've got some preliminary ideas on policy but there are a few grey areas that we want to get views on. Members of the Law Society IP Working Party will also be there. It's happening on 11 December".Astonishingly, given the huge importance of the subject and the fact that there are hardly any major sporting events taking place on that date, there are still some spaces left at the seminar. Do attend: the link to the invite and application is here. Incidentally, news of the spare places came to this Kat via Robin Fry, who has worked tirelessly on this subject for many years now (this blog's initial post on his work on groundless threats goes all the way back to May 2006). Well done, Robin, you deserve a Katpat for your efforts.
Around the weblogs. The 1709 Blog carries a reader's question concerning proxy sites, VPNs and the circumvention of website blocking orders to stop copyright infringement here. PatLit features two great posts from former guest Kat Stefano Barazza, one reviewing a US report on inconsistent IP policies of standard-setting bodies, the other on patent infringement as anticompetitive activity. Sally Cooper takes a look at Scotland's go-it-alone IP prospects on the SOLO IP blog (incidentally, that blog got 450 visits last week, the highest figure in recent memory), while Art & Artifice's Angela Saltarelli ponders over possible moral rights issues arising from interference with Banksy's iconic graffiti, here.
Tuesday tiddlywinks
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html