Jeremy knows
my fondness for big and expensive jewelry and
has kindly alerted me to this recent case where the jewelry house
Fabergé successfully claimed that a
Brooklyn restaurant had infringed its trade marks and its retail storefront.
|
Could a Summons Be Hidden Inside? |
Last June, Fabergé Ltd and Fabergé Services Ltd (Plaintiffs)
filed a trademark and copyright infringement suit against the owners of the
Faberge restaurant, located in Brooklyn, and their company, Good Vision Taste
(Defendants). On July 31, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
New York issued a
consent judgment and permanently enjoined defendants from
using the Fabergé (or Faberge) trade mark and from using the Fabergé storefront’s
design. The case is
Fabergé Ltd. et al.v. Yusufov et al., 1:14-cv-03519.
Fabergé was originally
the name of Peter Carl Fabergé, a Russian jeweler who became famous for creating
elaborate eggs
which became the gift of choice for the Russian imperial family afterAlexander III first commissioned one to offer to his wife as an Easter present in 1885. The eggs, each unique and made using gold, diamonds or other precious
materials, opened up to reveal their surprises, such as
chocolate truffles
a diamond necklace or a diamond replica of the Imperial crown. The Fabergé
company still produces and sells egg pendants and other high-end jewelry. The
Faberge restaurant is a somewhat more
mundane venture which opened in Fall 2013 on Emmons Avenue in Sheepshead Bay, a
part of Brooklyn where many immigrants from the former Soviet Unions have
chosen to live.
The
complaint alleged trademark infringement. It also claimed
that
Fabergé is a famous trademark
and that the Defendants were diluting the distinctive quality of the famous
mark by such unauthorized use. Plaintiffs own several
Fabergé trade marks in the U.S which all predate the use of ‘Faberge’
by the Brooklyn restaurateurs. The restaurant’s name did not have an accent on
the final ‘e’, but nevertheless sported a continental flair by replacing the “A”
in its name by the Eiffel Tower on the sign adorning its façade. The
Yelp page dedicated to the restaurant mistakenly spelled the restaurant’s name with an
accent on the final ‘e’.
The complaint also claimed that the restaurant had “menu
items that directly and obviously allude to the famous historical legacy of the
Plaintiffs.” The
menu indeed incorporates a Faberge salad and a St. Peter
kebab. It does not, however, seem to take much inspiration from Russia, even if
it features a “crazy Napoleon” pastry on the menu and serves caviar in
egg-shaped cups (see this
video at 3:
26).
Well, the restaurateurs’ use of the Faberge name for their
restaurant was indeed a
Berezina, as the Eastern District of New York Court permanently
enjoined Plaintiffs from using Fabergé, or Faberge, as a trade mark or the name
of a restaurant, catering service or bar, or as a keyword for search engine optimization
purposes.
It would have been hard to for the owners of the restaurant
to deny that they were inspired by the
Fabergé
company when naming their restaurant as they also used the
Fabergé retail storefront as their source of inspiration for their
own façade.
Fabergé owns a copyright
for the storefront design of its London and Kiev retail stores, which consists
of a repeating patterns of purple diamonds outlined in gold, which is designed
to recall the trellis pattern used on some of the original
Fabergé eggs (see p. 5 of the
complaint). The Brooklyn restaurant used a similar pattern on its
own façade, although the golden outlines are not as ornate. It also used the
diamond pattern in its inside décor (see this
video at 4:07). The Eastern
District of New York Court also permanently enjoined Defendants from
displaying, copying or making use of Plaintiff’s storefront design, or “any confusingly
similar variation thereof.”
Defendants have thirty days to destroy all materials and
documents bearing the Faberge name, to stop using Faberge as the name of their
restaurant and to stop incorporating the Fabergé
storefront design in their own storefront.
You could argue that "crazy Napoleon" is actually linked to Russia - he was "crazy" enough to try and invade Russia and fight over the winter - losing 1/2m men in the process (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon%27s_Invasion_of_Russia)
ReplyDelete@ Anonymous: Your comment inspired me to try for the 4th (5th? 6th?) time to try to read War and Peace...:)Merci!
ReplyDelete