Books may also become permanently unavailable when Kats appropriate them as beds |
Can collecting societies authorise
the reproduction and communication to the public of out-of-print works without
an express prior mandate from relevant rightholders?
This question is not merely academic,
as IPKat readers - in particular those based in France - may be aware that in
2012 France adopted a law allowing the digital exploitation of
unavailable books of the 20th century.
Among other things, this law provides
for the appointment of a central collecting society that is in charge of
granting licences in respect of orphan and out-of-print books, setting licence fees, collecting
and keeping the revenues of unlocated rightholders for ten years.
Unlike the UK
licensing scheme [discussed here] and the Orphan Works Directive [discussed here], under this French law the search
for relevant rightholders is to be carried out by the appointed collecting
society.
Libraries are allowed to use works
for free after ten years from their inclusion in an orphan work database
managed by the Bibliothéque Nationale de France. In any case, libraries would
only be able to show orphan books to their subscribers.
This legislative initiative was
mainly aimed at permitting use of out-of-commerce works. As such, in this Kat's
opinion it could be considered compatible with the Orphan Works Directive,
since this expressly allows Member States “to address larger mass
digitisation issues, such as in the case of so-called 'out-of-commerce' works”
(Recital 4).
The French Council of State is in fact unsure
whether a law that authorises a collecting society to allow the exploitation of
works without prior permission from relevant rightholders (who can subsequently
opt out of the system) is compatible with Directive 2001/29/EC (the InfoSoc Directive), or whether is instead
tantamount to an undue limitation to authors' rights.
As such, last May the Council of State decided to seek guidance from the Court of
Justice of the European Union and refer the following question:
Do the provisions… of Directive
2001/29/EC of 22 May 2001, preclude legislation… that gives approved collecting
societies the right to authorise the reproduction and the representation in
digital form of ‘out-of-print books’, while allowing the authors of those
books, or their successors in title, to oppose or put an end to that practice,
on the conditions that it lays down?
The case has now been numbered as
C-301/15 and further details can be found on the website of the UK Intellectual Property
Office, which also invites comments to be emailed to policy@ipo.gov.uk by 07 August
2015.
Is French law on out-of-print works compatible with EU law? A new CJEU reference
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, July 27, 2015
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html