The Global Forum on Intellectual Property 2015 (GFIP), under the auspices of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (popularly known as IPOS) together with the Singapore IP Academy just completed its two-day event (25 to 26 August) at the well-known Marina Bay Sands Hotel (right). The GFIP is the flagship event of the week-long IP Week@SG, now in its fourth year. This year’s GFIP took on particular meaning in light of the 50th anniversary festivities celebrated in Singapore earlier this month.
It's not how you punch, but who you punch ... |
... and how strictly you can maintain IP discipline |
The first plenary session addressed directly the theme of the conference, focusing on the evolving architecture of the global IP system and the influence of national IP systems and the tension between the territoriality of IP rights and the global scope of IP exploitation. First to speak was Dr Francis Gurry, Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Dr Gurry articulated the promise and challenge of an international system based on multilateral relationships. He also restated his vision for “a seamless global digital marketplace” based in the development of business models resting on legal principles. He also emphasized that, in his view, at least in the near term, IP harmonization was more likely to be limited to procedural subjects.
Dr Gurry's address was followed by comments from senior officials from the Japanese Patent Office and the State Intellectual Property Office of China. Speaking on the Japanese situation, Commissioner Hitoshi Ito reviewed the ongoing efforts of the Patent Office to continue to improve its patent services, including regarding the speed of the services, quality and extent of international cooperation. Mr He Zhimin, Deputy Commissioner of the Chinese Office recounted the four stages that China has undergone in developing its patent law system. He elaborated on the current aspirations to formulate a full-fledged IP strategy and forcefully articulated that, while China had succeeded in aligning itself with the international IP system, it would also seek to find its unique path when appropriate. With refreshing candour, he described in some detail in this regard China’s efforts to strengthen the enforcement environment. The final speaker of the session was Dr Stanley Lai, chairman of the board of IPOS and a leading IP practitioner in Singapore, serving as the head of the IP practice at Allen & Gledhill. Dr Lai traced the development of Singapore over its 50 years and the role played by IP. He speculated on how Singapore can seek to flourish by focusing on certain niche markets, for which IP protection will be central.
“Simple Past, Present Continuous…Future Perfect?” GFIP Conference Report I
Reviewed by Neil Wilkof
on
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html