With the
beginning of the new year, here’s also the first Never Too Late feature of 2016,
now on its 79th edition, as always lovingly penned by our friend and
colleague Alberto Bellan.
Here’s
what happened last week on this very blog:
Long time Katfriend and sometime blogger Prashant Reddy discusses IP
conferences focused upon India. Clashes between NGOs and industry-founded
initiatives are not being beneficial to a plural debate, he says.
Jin Ooi (Allen & Overy) analyses the latest development concerning Australia’s tobacco plain
packaging legislation, which resulted in a "win" for the Australian
government against Philip Morris Asia Limited.
EU’s days as “a logistical hub” for counterfeiters may be over, writes
Nikos [on the topic, see the
IPKat posts here and here].
Katfriend NG Kim Poh from Kuala Lumpur-based firm Shook Lin & Bok reports on a landmark patent validity and infringement decision of the
Federal Court of Malaysia (SKB Shutters Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd v Seng Kong
Shutter Industries Sdn. Bhd. & Anor), in which otherwise independently
valid dependent claims suffered a terrible fate.
2015 New Years Honours revealed the name of at least one character
in the field of IP law - that of The Hon Judge Nicholas Forwood
QC - who has been honoured with a Knight Bachelor in the Diplomatic Service and Overseas List for services to European
justice. Congrats from then IPKat!
**********
PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never too late 78 [week
ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and
lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani
writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP
Hairballs | Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO
| Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.
Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20
December] – GC on 5-stripe shoe mark | EPO
BoA in T 942/12 on liability and renewal practice
management for European patent attorneys | Magnesium Elektron v
Molycorp, ie how to serve
patent infringement proceedings on a Chinese company | EU Trade Mark reform
adopted | WIPO IP indicators | Provisional agreement on EU Trade Secrets
Directive | Battistelli’s proposal rejected? | “Je Suis” trade marks | Branding
and 3D printing.
Never too late 76 [week ending
on Sunday 13 December] – The Making of the TRIPS
Agreement | German Balsamico?! | Trade secrets in the US | European
Copyright Society | Merpel in Eponia | Henry Hadaway Organisation v
Pickwick Group Limited and Ors | CJEU activism on copyright | EU
Commission unveils future copyright reform path | Music publishing and
copyright | Dreaming of copyright, new eLAW event | Trade mark right exhaustion
| VW trade mark disaster | Linking and copyright | elite media takes IP wrong.
Never too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6
December] – BHG on blocking injunctions |
IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on
patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14
referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for
Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark
partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were
never consulted | What hacker means.
Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, January 04, 2016
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html