Enjoying the latest IPKat wrap up......... |
The Rome Court demonstrated
the narrow scope of Italian copyright exceptions for news reporting and
criticism/review in the case of Mediaset vs Gruppo L'Espresso, finding that TV
programmes could not benefit from either of these exceptions.
Economists Oliver Hart and
Bengt Holmström were awarded the Nobel prize in economics for their work on
contracts. Their studies have examined how contracts affect relationships between
employers, employees, societies and governments.
A round up of recent IP
issues relating to Brexit and two upcoming events focusing on the impact of
Brexit on IP.
Neil considered if we are
on the cusp of a potential competition law problem in the area of cloud
computing services, as recently reported by The Economist in an article on Amazon
Web Services.
A round-up post of the
week's news and forthcoming events.
Two recent English cases, Karen
Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly
consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks.
The German Federal Court of
Justice's decision in Sparkassen Group/Banco Santander, regarding a dispute
over the validity of Sparkassen's colour mark "red" for financial
services, looked closely at the proper methodology of consumer surveys designed
to prove acquired distinctiveness.
The German Federal Court of
Justice overturned two decisions by the Federal Patent Court when correcting the
fact finding of the lower court and invalidating the patents in question for
lack of novelty.
The Cronut comes to the UK!
US-based Katfriend Matthew Hintz informed us of the Trade Mark saga of the
croissant-doughnut hybrid.
Katfriend Nedim Malovic updated
us on the judgment of Universal Protein Supplements Corp v European Union Intellectual
Property Office Case, T-335/15, EU:T:2016:579, concerning an application to
register a figurative sign representing a body-builder as a EU trade mark.
The EU Commission has proposed a directive on
copyright in the Digital Single Market that intends to introduce a new related
right in press publications into the EU copyright framework.
The recent case of Secretary of State for Health
and Others v Servier concerns the intersection of patent rights and antitrust
claims, and the first occasion on which prescribing and reimbursement matters
have been raised by way of defence in a claim made by public healthcare
authorities against a pharmaceutical company.
Book
Review: Nicholas Lovell’s The Curve.
A
group of EU-based academics published a letter addressed to a number of EU
institutions in the aftermath of the release by the EU Commission of the second
copyright package.
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never too late 117 [week ending on
Sunday 9 October] | The Commission's DSMS and CJEU case law:
what relationship? | Generic marks as valuable commercial information | Other
people's computers | Compared to Svensson, GS Media is not that bad after all |
Introducing our new InternKats! | C-223/15: no EU-wide confusion, no EU-wide
injunction
Never too
late 116 [week ending on
Sunday 2 October] | Book Review: WTO Dispute Settlement and the
TRIPS Agreement | The IPKat team news: new arrivals and farewells | Brexit -
who has the power to change UK law? | Book review: Computer Crimes and Digital
Investigations | European business urge continued UK involvement in UPC on eve
of Competitiveness Council meeting | Wednesday Whimsies | Book review: Global
Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century
Never too
late 115 [week ending on
Sunday 25 September] | Book Review: Arnold reviews “Economic
Approaches to Intellectual Property” | The English approach to obviousness – It
all depends on the facts? | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Biosimilars – similar but
different? | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch – role of experts in
litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century | Law & Economics – The Italian
Edition | Friday Fantasies | Latest thoughts about Brexit and the UPC | Eye
‘should’ve’ done that! – Specsavers nears approval to trade mark single word
“should’ve” & “shouldve” | A song of Ice and Ice | ChIPs Global Summit
Report 3: Congratulations – your patent has been allowed, when is it finally
final?
Never too
late 114 [week ending on
Sunday 18 September] | Commissioner unveils new copyright package | Open
letter from Wikimedia et al on copyright package | Globalisation,
Globalisation, Globalisation| Philip Morris loses investment arbitration | EPIP
highlights | 20 million thanks | Tea & trade secret theft | Patent quality
conference | free wifi networks & copyright infringement | Chiefs in
Intellectual Property summit | Innovation and its discontents | GS Media rapid
response event summary | AIPPI Congress reports
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html