 |
| New Year New Cat |
Too busy working on those new year’s
resolutions to keep up with IPKat this week? No problem – here is the 130th
edition of Never Too Late.
InternKat
Tian reviewed Dr. Qiao Yongzhong's book “Maintenance time and
the industry development of patents -- empirical research with evidence from
China”
Full low down on the interim decision
handed down by Mr Justice Carr on 29 December in the biosimilars battle of
Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd and Others v AbbVie Biotechnology
Limited [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch).
The European IP Institutes Network
(EIPIN) is recruiting 15 PhD candidates wishing
to conduct doctoral research on the role of IP in the adaptive complexities of
innovation.
Neil looked at an example of co-branding
employed by a senior citizen facility
And the weekly round ups Sunday
Surprises and Around the IP
Blogs
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATE
Never
Too Late 129 [week ending on Sunday 1 Janurary]
A Kat's 2016 Copyright Awards I Happy Public Domain Day! I The champagne of
trade mark disputes I Jaguar Land Rover DEFEND[ER]s its trade mark I
Länsförsäkringar, Länsförsäkringar, bork, bork, bork! I Passing off the
National Guild of Removers and Storers I Fuss over function: In case you missed
the annual IP-World Christmas party I The Supreme People's Court of China's
Michael Jordan Trademark Decision I Intermediary IP injunctions: what are the
EU implications of the UK experience? I Swedish Supreme Court has ruled that
sport broadcasts are not protected by copyright I Swedish Patent and
Registration Office refuses registration of figurative mark because contrary to
morality and public order I Never too Late I Around the IP Blogs
Never Too Late 128 [week
ending on Sunday 25 December]
| Sunday Surprises | A TITANIC trade mark dispute | Book Review: two new
methodology books for EQE candidates: Smart in C and Tactics for D| Around the
IP Blogs| Around the IP Blogs | Before there was copyright there was
censorship: the tale of "The Feast in the House of Levi” by Veronese |
Permission to appeal in patent cases - farewell to the Pozzoli approach |
Permission to appeal in patent cases - farewell to the Pozzoli approach | EPO
bows to EU Commission on patentability of products of essentially biological
processes | Monday Miscellany | Groundless threats - Nvidia v Hardware Labs
|
Never Too Late 127 [week
ending on Sunday 18 December]
| Around the IP Blogs | Top-level Property Rights Protection Guideline released
in China | CEIPI/EAO Conference--"Copyright Enforcement in the Online
World" | More on the Swedish application of GS Media | Mini UPC Update: UK
signs Protocol on Privileges & Immunities | When a holiday e-card meets IP:
Well done, IPOS! | Unregistered designs for eXreme storage | Academic
publishing houses lose appeal against Delhi University & photocopy shop |
GS Media finds its first application in Germany | Monday Miscellaneous | Part
36 offers in the IP Enterprise Court
Never Too Late 126 [week
ending on Sunday 11 December]
| Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? I Obviousness over the CGK - dead
or alive? I Will UK industry suffer from Government's "ratify now, repent
at leisure" UPC stance? | Indian Trade Marks Registry to widen its doors
for recording “well known” marks | Mediaplayers and streaming: AG Campos
Sánchez-Bordona in Filmspeler proposes broad interpretation of notion of
'indispensable intervention' | AIPPI Rapid Response Report: Debating Lyrica's
recurring pain on plausibility, abuse and infringement | PPDs and standard
disclosure - can you have your cake and eat it? | BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme
Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not
whole product | (Belatedly) remembering Raymond Niro, the most influential
person in patent litigation whom you may have never heard of | Genuine use of
three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovens | Wild Boys
Sometimes Lose It: Duran Duran fail to reclaim their US copyright |Around the
IP Blogs
Photo
credit: Steve Jurvetson
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
Rating:
Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher
on
Wednesday, January 18, 2017
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html